2017
DOI: 10.1002/2016jb013791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New method for measuring compressibility and poroelasticity coefficients in porous and permeable rocks

Abstract: Over the last decades, a large understanding has been gained on the elastic properties of rocks. Rocks are, however, porous materials, which properties depend on both response of the bulk material and of the pores. Because in that case both the applied external pressure and the fluid pressure play a role, different poroelasticity coefficients exist. While theoretical relations exist, measuring precisely those different coefficients remains an experimental challenge. Accounting for the different experimental co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The details of this calculation are given in the supporting information. It might also be possible to estimate the solid bulk modulus from forced confining and pore fluid pressure oscillation measurements (Pimienta et al, ). However, for nanoporous media this may be problematic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of this calculation are given in the supporting information. It might also be possible to estimate the solid bulk modulus from forced confining and pore fluid pressure oscillation measurements (Pimienta et al, ). However, for nanoporous media this may be problematic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples from this rock have porosities ranging from 17% to 23% and a quartz content ranging from 75% to 95% (Pimienta et al, ). Bentheim sandstone is a quartz‐rich sandstone also used as a reference rock (e.g., Blöcher et al, ; Louis et al, ; Klein et al, ; Pimienta et al, ; Vajdova et al, ), with a porosity is in the range of 20% up to 25%. All three rock samples are documented to be isotropic and homogeneous at the sample scale, thus allowing for a good applicability of the method tested in this contribution.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Rock Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, for a clean sandstone such as Bentheimer, K s and K s were not only different but also considerably lower than the bulk modulus of quartz. Pimienta et al [22] also indirectly estimated K s for Bentheimer sandstone from measurements of various poroelastic parameters. They observed that K s can be considered as a constant and equal to the bulk modulus of quartz at P > 5.0 MPa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%