1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-6226(97)00146-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct and correlated selection response for litter size and litter weight at birth in the first parity in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…I) for W21 (0.15) was lower than that for W42 (0.21), which was in agreement with the results reported by Eisen and Prasetyo [5] and, in a seminal paper, by Falconer [6]. Estimated heritabilities for these two traits were also in close agreement with those reported by Fernández et al [7] for litter weight using DFREML [23] on the same mice population as analysed here. Heritability estimated using Model HO for WG (0.09) was clearly lower than that for the other traits, but it was in close agreement with the one found for another trait such as litter weight in a similar population [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…I) for W21 (0.15) was lower than that for W42 (0.21), which was in agreement with the results reported by Eisen and Prasetyo [5] and, in a seminal paper, by Falconer [6]. Estimated heritabilities for these two traits were also in close agreement with those reported by Fernández et al [7] for litter weight using DFREML [23] on the same mice population as analysed here. Heritability estimated using Model HO for WG (0.09) was clearly lower than that for the other traits, but it was in close agreement with the one found for another trait such as litter weight in a similar population [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although the heritabilities estimated here using Model 1 for LW (0.10) do not exactly coincide with the one we previously reported of 0.21 [5], both the genetic (0.96) and the phenotypic (0.93) correlations (Tab. I) estimated between LS and LW were very similar to those previously provided (1.00 and 0.96, respectively [5]).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Although the heritabilities estimated here using Model 1 for LW (0.10) do not exactly coincide with the one we previously reported of 0.21 [5], both the genetic (0.96) and the phenotypic (0.93) correlations (Tab. I) estimated between LS and LW were very similar to those previously provided (1.00 and 0.96, respectively [5]). This is consistent with other authors: a genetic correlation of 1.0 was reported for LS and LW in mice by Luxford et al [17] and for LS and litter weight at weaning by Luxford and Beilharz [16].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…The genetic correlation between litter size and litter weight is high (0.6 from Rothschild and Bidanel, 1995;0.5 from . In mice, genetic gain in litter size was slightly higher in a divergent selection experiment on litter weight than in a line selected on litter size (Fernandez, 1998). It might be a good idea to use information on litter weight in the selection for litter size.…”
Section: Birth Weight and Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%