1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf02390975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dipole moment of the hearts of various species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
3
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results, as well as our preliminary findings with real fMCG measurements, can largely explain an apparent discrepancy between the vector peak-magnitude reported previously by fMCG studies using simplified models (Leeuwen et al 2004, Horigome et al 2001) and the values predicted by studies on vertebrate animals (Nelson et al 1975). …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…These results, as well as our preliminary findings with real fMCG measurements, can largely explain an apparent discrepancy between the vector peak-magnitude reported previously by fMCG studies using simplified models (Leeuwen et al 2004, Horigome et al 2001) and the values predicted by studies on vertebrate animals (Nelson et al 1975). …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…The value of the dipole moment was equal to 2.0•10 −5 Am. This was in agreement with the data available elsewhere [33], [38].…”
Section: B Numerical Simulationssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This assumption was somehow supported by a low interpersonal variation of the equivalent dipole parameters (Table 1). The dipole parameters were determined experimentally from ECG measurements and supported by literature data, [33], [38]. The obtained dipole components were corrected using the method based on transfer impedance approach as proposed by Geselowitz [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between the peak-VM values obtained from fMCG and the estimated fetal weight resembles the one predicted analytically by studies in vertebrate animals (Nelson et al 1975), which indicated a power growth model of the form y = 3.43 · x 0.826 . The exponent parameter of both models are in good agreement, yet the multiplicative constant (scaling factor) estimated in our study is higher ( i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…the commonly used linear regression model and a nonlinear power growth model. We tested the power model based on previous observations relating heart dipole moments to heart and body weight in animal studies (Nelson et al 1975). Outliers were automatically identified and excluded in the fitting process using the ROUT method available in the GraphPad Prism (Motulsky and Brown, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%