Diplomatic Dilemma dan Standar Ganda Politik Amerika Serikat Terhadap Konflik Sipil-Militer Mesir Tahun 2013

Setiawan, Azhari

doi:10.18196/hi.2015.0067.67-77

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition to stopping communism, America also spreads the notion of democracy that is recognized as the best government system [16]. To strengthen its strength, America in the Regan period had many relations with countries such as Israel, Jordan and Saudi Arabia [17] In a speech that presented in 2003, President Bush said that democracy and Islam could walk side by side. This is evidenced by the success of democracy in Turkey and also Indonesia.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

International communication dynamics of American intervention efforts to democratize in the arab spring through forward strategy for freedom in the middle east

Nurislamia

Asriya

2019

IJCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This papera aims to describe how international communication dynamics of America to response of Arab Spring. Arab Spring is an event that shocked the world when the Middle East flared up. The demonstrators took to the streets to demand an authoritarian regime downgrade and replace it with democracy. The democratization process that took place in the Middle East was in the world spotlight. America is considered a country that intervenes so that democratization can be realized in the Middle East. This is supported by various American interests in the Middle East. By using research library data search methods, the authors get the results of the form of intervention carried out by America to realize democratization in the Middle East.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

International communication dynamics of American intervention efforts to democratize in the arab spring through forward strategy for freedom in the middle east

Nurislamia

Asriya

2019

IJCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Berkenaan dengan pembahasan politik standar ganda Amerika Serikat, terdapat beberapa penelitian yang sudah dilakukan, diantaranya penelitian (Setiawan, 2015) Sementara dalam penelitian ini, penulis mencoba mengungkap perilaku desdruktif yang ada dibalik politik standar ganda Amerika Serikat dengan "berkedok" demokratisasi terhadap sistem pemerintahan Mesir dan Suriah. Dalam proses demokratisasi Mesir, Amerika Serikat hadir sebagai kawan dalam penurunan Husni Mubarak dari jabatannya untuk menghindarkan pertumpahan darah.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Perilaku Destruktif Dalam Politik Standar Ganda Amerika Serikat Terhadap Demokratisasi Mesir dan Suriah

Hidayat

2022

Ascarya j. of islam. sci. cult. and soc. stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hypocrisy is a trait that is very hated in Islam and is a disgraceful trait for its adherents. Hypocrisy is a trait possessed by the enemies of Islam who want to destroy the glory of Islam from within, even trying to destroy Islamic countries, especially those in the Middle East, where Islam first appeared and spread widely among Arabs. This paper aims to find out the practice of hypocritical behavior that occurs at the country level by using a qualitative method that focuses on a literature approach, That is by collecting data obtained from various references in the form of articles, journals, books and research related to material objects and formal objects which are then analyzed using the conspiracy theory of Robert O Zelency (1987). The result of this research is the double standard political success played by the United States who wants to control the oil fields in Egypt and Syria under the guise of calling for democratization in the government system. America acts as a friend to Egypt in the process of transitioning from authoritarian power to democracy and has been very active in guarding the decline of Hosni Mubarak from his leadership, while in Syria, America has supported opposition groups to overthrow a legitimate government that is considered to be running the government in a dictatorial way. America also provided assistance to opposition groups in the form of weapons to expedite the process of overthrowing Bashar Al-Assad from power. America's double-standard politics towards Egypt and Syria is a project undertaken to realize a larger agenda in the geopolitical national political arena.

show abstract

“…Not only the Myanmar coup that resulted in many fatalities, many coups in the world carried out by the military took many victims, one of which was the coup carried out by the Egyptian military against president Mohamed Morsi. This coup alone resulted in 3,000 fatalities, most of them demonstrators who rejected the Egyptian military coup led by Abdul Fattah As Sisi, who was the commanderin-chief of the Egyptian armed forces (Setiawan, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Freedom of Speech Under International Law: Myanmar's Anti-Coup Demonstration Violence Case

Gunawan

Amirullah

Permana

et al. 2021

JCH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper aims to examine the position of international law against violence committed by the Myanmar military known as Tatmadaw, against Myanmar which held anti-coup demonstrations in Myanmar. The research used the normative legal research method, with the main source of data collection of legal material containing normative law. The results showed that Myanmar is one of the countries in Southeast Asia whose government has been dominated by the military. In early 2021, the Tatmadaw staged a coup against Myanmar's President Aung San Suu Kyi. The tragedy began in the 2020 elections, in which the National Democratic League (NLD) was elected as the majority to sit in Myanmar's parliament. However, Tatmadaw could have no election results and no coup. Burmese, who did not support a coup by Myanmar's military, made a massive dip in the streets. Tatmadaw performs violent acts for action until 2019. However, from the direction of the protesters, some protesters became victims of violence by the Tatmadaw. It reflects the restrictions on the freedom of speech of the People of Myanmar. Free speech is an important right of the People of Myanmar to be part of the good Human Rights face-to-face by international law through arbitrary ministers by the Tatmadaw. The Tatmadaw's acts of violence against Myanmar violate human rights set forth in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in articles 19 and 29. In addition, freedom of speech is also governed by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in article 19.

show abstract

Diplomatic Dilemma dan Standar Ganda Politik Amerika Serikat Terhadap Konflik Sipil-Militer Mesir Tahun 2013

Cited by 3 publications

References 3 publications

International communication dynamics of American intervention efforts to democratize in the arab spring through forward strategy for freedom in the middle east

International communication dynamics of American intervention efforts to democratize in the arab spring through forward strategy for freedom in the middle east

Perilaku Destruktif Dalam Politik Standar Ganda Amerika Serikat Terhadap Demokratisasi Mesir dan Suriah

Freedom of Speech Under International Law: Myanmar's Anti-Coup Demonstration Violence Case

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About