2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.04.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dip coating assisted polylactic acid deposition on steel surface: Film thickness affected by drag force and gravity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…comparing to F9,B1 with (15%kol.+0.3% xan.) which might be attributed to the reduction in the viscosity of the coating dispersion in these formulas, an effect which withdrawal that reduces the volume of the liquid deposited on the tablet surface leading to a thinner film layer 29,30,31 . On the other hand, the significant increase in the coated tablet weight and thickness which were detected in OST formulas F12,F13,B4 and B5 double and triple coated respectively with (15% kol.+0.3% xan.)…”
Section: Pre-compression and Post-compression Parameters Of The Prepamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comparing to F9,B1 with (15%kol.+0.3% xan.) which might be attributed to the reduction in the viscosity of the coating dispersion in these formulas, an effect which withdrawal that reduces the volume of the liquid deposited on the tablet surface leading to a thinner film layer 29,30,31 . On the other hand, the significant increase in the coated tablet weight and thickness which were detected in OST formulas F12,F13,B4 and B5 double and triple coated respectively with (15% kol.+0.3% xan.)…”
Section: Pre-compression and Post-compression Parameters Of The Prepamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic principle of dip coating is to deposit thin films of polymer solution on a substrate by immersing the substrate in a polymer solution for some time and then withdrawing the substrate from the polymer solution bath [3]. Many of the previous studies of dip coating processes [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] were designed to determine the effect of coating process parameters on the layer thickness. The layer thickness depends on, for example, withdrawal rate, number of dip cycles, and physical properties of the fluid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, a non-significant increase in the coated tablet weight and thickness was detected between the mono coated formulas themselves (F1, F3, and F5) and also between the double coated formulas themselves (F2, F4, and F6) where different coating solution T1, T2 and T3 used. This was attributed to the slight increase in the viscosity of the enteric coating formulas resulting from increasing eudragit L-100 concentration from 13.5% in (F1, F2) to 15.5% and 17.5% in (F3, F4) and (F5, F6) respectively, an effect which might increase the hydrodynamic drag during the dipping process [22][23][24]. Furthermore, non-significant differences were observed in the hardness between the core and coated tablets and between the coated tablets themselves indicating that the enteric oroslippery coating formula had a negligible effect on the hardness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%