2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.00875.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dinucleotide microsatellite primers designed for a critically endangered primate, the black lion tamarin (Leontopithecus chrysopygus)

Abstract: Black lion tamarin (BLT) monkeys (Leontopithecus chrysopygus) have suffered a severe reduction in their natural range and are consequently critically endangered. Because allozyme data showed very low levels of variation, it was not clear if these monkeys had much genetic diversity. We designed microsatellite primers for BLTs, and from them we identified nine polymorphic loci, seven of which were tested on golden lion tamarins (GLTs) (Leontopithecus rosalia). All of the seven polymorphic loci and two other mono… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From these 19 microsatellites, 17 (89.4 %) pro-duced robust alleles, of which 9 (47.4%) were polymorphic and 8 (42.1%) monomorphic; the remaining 2 (10.5%) failed to amplify fragments under all tested conditions [Martins and Galetti Jr., 2011]. As such, the 9 polymorphic microsatellite markers used by us were those identified in L. rosalia [Grativol et al, 2001], L. chrysopygus [Perez-Sweeney et al, 2005] and L. chrysomelas [Galbusera and Gillemot, 2008]. One primer of each locus pair was constructed with a M13 tail on the 5 -end, and a fluorescently labelled M13 primer was used in a 3-primer PCR, following a pre-established protocol [Schuelke, 2000].…”
Section: Microsatellite Genotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these 19 microsatellites, 17 (89.4 %) pro-duced robust alleles, of which 9 (47.4%) were polymorphic and 8 (42.1%) monomorphic; the remaining 2 (10.5%) failed to amplify fragments under all tested conditions [Martins and Galetti Jr., 2011]. As such, the 9 polymorphic microsatellite markers used by us were those identified in L. rosalia [Grativol et al, 2001], L. chrysopygus [Perez-Sweeney et al, 2005] and L. chrysomelas [Galbusera and Gillemot, 2008]. One primer of each locus pair was constructed with a M13 tail on the 5 -end, and a fluorescently labelled M13 primer was used in a 3-primer PCR, following a pre-established protocol [Schuelke, 2000].…”
Section: Microsatellite Genotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four microsatellite markers isolated from Leontopithecus chrysopygus were also used: Leon2, Leon21, Leon27 and Leon30 [Perez-Sweeney et al, 2005]. The PCRs were performed con- taining: ≤10 ng of DNA; 0.5 µM of reverse primer and 0.5 µM of forward primer marked with dye labelled on its 5′ end, and the HotStar Taq Master Mix Kit in the concentration of 1× PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , 200 µM of dNTP and 2.5 units of HotStart Taq (Qiagen).…”
Section: Laboratory Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventeen microsatellites, which were previously designed for and successfully amplified in multiple Neotropical primate species, were tested. Four microsatellites were isolated in at least two Sapajus species (PEPC3, PEPC8, PEPC40, and PEPC59: Escobar-Páramo, 2000), one in Lagothrix lagotricha (PEPL4: Escobar-Páramo, 2000), eight in Cebus capucinus (Ceb3, Ceb8, Ceb9, Ceb11, Ceb119, Ceb120, Ceb121, and Ceb130: Muniz and Vigilant, 2008), one in Leontopithecus rosalia (Lr.P2BH6: Grativol et al, 2001), two in Leontopithecus chrysopygus (Leon15c85 and Leon21c75: Perez-Sweeney et al, 2005), and one in Leontopithecus chrysomelas (Lchµ07: Galbusera and Gillemot, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%