Dimensions of Musical Creativity

Abstract

Current literature on creative cognition has developed rich conceptual landscapes dedicated to the analysis of both individual and collective forms of creativity. This work has favored the emergence of unifying theories on domain-general creative abilities in which the main experiential, behavioral, computational, and neural aspects involved in everyday creativity are examined and discussed. But while such accounts have gained important analytical leverage for describing the overall conditions and mechanisms through which creativity emerges and operates, they necessarily leave contextual forms of creativity less explored. Among the latter, musical practices have recently drawn the attention of scholars interested in its creative properties as well as in the creative potential of those who engage with them. In the present article, we compare previously posed theories of creativity in musical and non-musical domains to lay the basis of a conceptual framework that mitigates the tension between (i) individual and collective and (ii) domain-general and domain-specific perspectives on creativity. In doing so, we draw from a range of scholarship in music and enactive cognitive science, and propose that creative cognition may be best understood as a process of skillful organism–environment adaptation that one cultivates endlessly. With its focus on embodiment, plurality, and adaptiveness, our account points to a structured unity between living systems and their world, disclosing a variety of novel analytical resources for research and theory across different dimensions of (musical) creativity.

Creative pedagogies in the time of pandemic: a case study with conservatory students

“…With this in mind, consider how the lockdown period helped P.6 realise he is part of a community of practice, and how 'interesting projects' are thought to evolve from mutual entanglement and collaboration; or, again, how another participant spontaneously started to chat with a colleague, leading to the discovery of novel learning opportunities supported by online resources. It is interesting to note that the need for novelty and exploration led to new forms of communication among students, highlighting the link between creativity and social connectedness explored in recent musical and non-musical literature (Sawyer and DeZutter 2009;Schiavio and Benedek 2020), particularly in pedagogical contexts (Burnard and Murphy 2013). More in general, the experiences reported by our participants well aligns with the three main avenues indicated to constitute the basis of e-learning:…”

On Creativity, Music’s AI Completeness, and Four Challenges for Artificial Musical Creativity

“…Recent years witnessed a major growth of research on human and computational musical creativity in computer science, MIR and music psychology (Iñesta et al, 2016;Sturm et al, 2019a;Carnovalini and Rodà, 2020;Fernández and Vico, 2013;Schiavio and Benedek, 2020;Miranda, 2021). There are many different problem settings involved.…”

The Embodied-Enactive-Interactive Brain: Bridging Neuroscience and Creative Arts Therapies

“…Aesthetic experiences, engaging the brain's reward network, are laden with tension, fluctuations in uncertainty, generating prediction errors ("surprises") that create a yearning for resolution, triggering predictive processes directed at future events of emotional significance (Koelsch, 2014;Lehne and Koelsch, 2015;Shany et al, 2019). Minimization of prediction error involves the embodied capacity to generate experience through action, thereby fostering creativity (Daikoku, 2019;Schiavio and Benedek, 2020). In this sense, CATs may tap into the intrinsic motivation to seek predictive progress and offer clients opportunities to venture out of predictable zones (Gottlieb et al, 2013).…”