1971
DOI: 10.21236/ad0734325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensions of Leadership in a Simulated Combat Situation

Abstract: This report may be destroyed when It Is no longer needed. Please do not return it to the behavior and Systems Research Laboratory. NOTE: The findings In this report are not to be construed as en official Department of the Army position, unless so designated by other authorized documents. Unclassified Security Classification DOCUMENT CONTROL DATA-R & D (Security classitlcation of title, body of abstract and Indexing mnnotatt•o must be entered when the overall report It :eaetled)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was particularly true at the company, battalion, and brigade-levels of application. This is consistent with research by Helme, Willemin, & Grafton ( 1971 ). who found that "two broad domains of officer-activity were clearly differentiatedcombat leadership and technical/managerial leadership."…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This was particularly true at the company, battalion, and brigade-levels of application. This is consistent with research by Helme, Willemin, & Grafton ( 1971 ). who found that "two broad domains of officer-activity were clearly differentiatedcombat leadership and technical/managerial leadership."…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Figure 1 shows the seven scales of Part II, and lists the attribute that each scale is intended to measure. Five of the seven scales correspond to the factors derived by Helnie, Willemin , and Grafton (1971) , and two correspond to the principal leadership dimensions identified by Stogdill (1974) and Fleishman (1974). The rater is asked to rank-order the sc'tles in terms of the officer 's relative potential for future assignments and then to rate the officer on the 7-step scale defined in Figure 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This test battery also included biographical reports and self-descriptive statements of interests and attitudes. In the process of its development and refinement, the battery was administered to 6,500 active duty officers in 1958 and 1959 and to about 4,000 in 1961 and 1962 (Helme, Willemin, & Grafton, 1971).…”
Section: Officer Assessment Center Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the second day, the examinee was awakened at 0230 after about 4 hours' sleep and told that the host nation was at war. The remainder of the exercises were carried out under "emergency" conditions with the intent of inducing fatigue and stress in the examinee (Helme, Willemin, & Grafton, 1971).…”
Section: Administrative Exercisesmentioning
confidence: 99%