Dimensions of impulsive behaviour in abstinent alcoholics

Dom, Geert; Wilde, Bieke De; Hulstijn, Wouter; Sabbe, Bernard

doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.007

Cited by 66 publications

(73 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Consistent with findings stemming from personality research, neuropsychological studies suggest that impulsivity is a multifaceted construct comprised of several components which are influenced by different neurobiological mechanisms (Reynolds et al, 2006). During the past decade, numerous attempts have been made to clarify the factorial nature of neurocognitive aspects/measures of impulsivity (Christiansen et al, 2012;Dom et al, 2007;Reynolds, et al, 2006). Based on the results of these studies, most current neuropsychological models agree that on a conceptual and experimental level, impulsivity can be divided into impulsive action (being characterized by deficits in response inhibition) and impulsive choice (being associated with difficulties to curb the "lure" of reward in order to optimize decision-making processes) (Dalley, Everitt, & Robbins, 2011;Lane, Cherek, Rhodes, & Pietras, 2003;Reynolds et al, 2006).…”

Section: Neurocognitive Aspects Of Impulsivitymentioning

confidence: 82%

“…As proximate measures of the neurobiology underlying impulsive behavior, neurocognitive instruments serve as indicators of endophenotypes, which may represent particularly attractive therapeutic targets (Gottesman & Gould, 2003). Although a number of studies suggest some degree of correspondence between self-report and neurocognitive tasks of impulsivity (Christiansen, Cole, Goudie, & Field, 2012), there are more data to suggest that these disparate measures should not be referred to under the same rubric (Aichert et al, 2012;Christiansen et al, 2012;Cyders & Coskunpinar, 2011;Dom, De Wilde, Hulstijn, & Sabbe, 2007;Meda et al, 2009;Reynolds et al, 2006). Indeed, the small magnitude of the observed effect sizes indicates that largely, there is more variability in what is being assessed via self-report and neurocognitive tasks of impulsivity than there is overlapping content domain (Cyders & Coskunpinar, 2011).…”

Section: General Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Impulsivity as a vulnerability factor for poor addiction treatment outcomes: A review of neurocognitive findings among individuals with substance use disorders

Stevens

Verdejo-García

Goudriaan

et al. 2014

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Self Cite

266

178

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the current review, we explore the hypothesis that individual differences in neurocognitive aspects of impulsivity (i.e., cognitive and motor disinhibition, delay discounting and impulsive decision-making) among individuals with a substance use disorder are linked to unfavorable addiction treatment outcomes, including high drop-out rates and difficulties in achieving and maintaining abstinence. A systematic review of the literature was carried out using PubMed, PsycINFO and Web of Knowledge searches. Twenty-five unique empirical papers were identified and findings were considered in relation to the different impulsivity dimensions. Although conceptual/methodological heterogeneity and lack of replication are key limitations of studies in this area, findings speak for a prominent role of cognitive disinhibition, delay discounting and impulsive decision-making in the ability to successfully achieve and maintain abstinence during and following addiction treatment. In contrast, indices of motor disinhibition appear to be unrelated to abstinence levels. Whereas the relationship between impulsivity and treatment retention needs to be examined more extensively, preliminary evidence suggests that impulsive/risky decision-making is unrelated to premature treatment drop-out among individuals with a substance use disorder. The reviewed findings are discussed in terms of their clinical implications.

show abstract

Section: Neurocognitive Aspects Of Impulsivitymentioning

confidence: 82%

Section: General Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impulsivity as a vulnerability factor for poor addiction treatment outcomes: A review of neurocognitive findings among individuals with substance use disorders

Stevens

Verdejo-García

Goudriaan

et al. 2014

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Self Cite

266

178

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As noted previously, there is substantial empirical evidence indicating that impulsivity is a multifactorial construct comprised of several related components [17,18,19,20]. In addition, these different components of impulsivity appear to recruit different brain circuitries and may be susceptible to diverse pharmacological influences [21].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impulsivity in Cocaine-Dependent Individuals with and without Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Stevens¹,

Roeyers

Dom³

et al. 2015

Eur Addict Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Cocaine-dependent individuals (CDI) display increased impulsivity. However, despite its multifactorial nature most studies in CDI have treated impulsivity monolithically. Moreover, the impact of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has often not been taken into account. This study investigates whether CDI with ADHD (CDI+ADHD) differ from CDI without an ADHD diagnosis and healthy controls (HC) on several impulsivity measures. Methods: Thirty-four CDI, 25 CDI+ADHD and 28 HC participated in this study. Trait impulsivity was assessed with the motor, attentional and non-planning subscales of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11). Neurocognitive dimensions of impulsivity were examined with the stop signal task (SST), delay discounting task (DDT) and information sampling task (IST). Results: Relative to HC, both CDI and CDI+ADHD scored higher on all BIS-11 subscales, required more time to inhibit their responses (SST) and sampled less information before making a decision (IST). Greater discounting of delayed rewards (DDT) was only found among CDI+ADHD. Compared to CDI without ADHD, CDI+ADHD scored higher on the BIS-11 non-planning and total scale and showed higher discounting rates. Conclusion: CDI score higher on several indices of impulsivity relative to HC, regardless of whether they have concomitant ADHD or not. CDI+ADHD are specifically characterized by a lack of future orientation compared to CDI without ADHD.

show abstract

“…También debían cumplir los siguientes requi sitos: no tener ni haber tenido alguna alteración neurológica o psiquiátrica ni estar bajo tratamiento por dichas afecciones, no po seer alguna adicción o estar bajo tratamien to por adicción. Para consignar esta información se administró una Ficha de Datos Sociodemográficos y el Cuestionario de Patrón de Consumo de Alcohol y otras Sustancias (Dom, Dewilde, Hulstijn & Sabbe, 2007).…”

Section: Muestraunclassified

Características De La Experiencia Emocional Inducida Mediante Fragmentos De Películas en Una Muestra De Jóvenes Argentinos

Michelini¹,

Acuña²,

Godoy³

2015

Interd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dimensions of impulsive behaviour in abstinent alcoholics

Cited by 66 publications

References 31 publications

Impulsivity as a vulnerability factor for poor addiction treatment outcomes: A review of neurocognitive findings among individuals with substance use disorders

Impulsivity as a vulnerability factor for poor addiction treatment outcomes: A review of neurocognitive findings among individuals with substance use disorders

Impulsivity in Cocaine-Dependent Individuals with and without Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Características De La Experiencia Emocional Inducida Mediante Fragmentos De Películas en Una Muestra De Jóvenes Argentinos

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About