2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.22.529573
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensionality reduction methods for extracting functional networks from large-scale CRISPR screens

Abstract: CRISPR-Cas9 screens facilitate the discovery of gene functional relationships and phenotype-specific dependencies. The Cancer Dependency Map (DepMap) is the largest compendium of whole-genome CRISPR screens aimed at identifying cancer-specific genetic dependencies across human cell lines. A mitochondria-associated bias has been previously reported to mask signals for genes involved in other functions, and thus, methods for normalizing this dominant signal to improve co-essentiality networks are of interest. In… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This revealed a prominent cluster of functional interactions (Fig. 4F) comprising NMD factor genes such as SMG5, SMG6, SMG7, UPF1 , and UPF3B , suggesting that the RPCO scores derived from CRISPR screens 67 are powerful for identifying NMD factors. Within this cluster were two candidate genes residing within 1q21.1-23.1, PMF1 and GON4L , showing notable codependency scores with SMG5 (0.06 and 0.0062, for PMF1 and GON4L , respectively) , SMG6 (0.02 and 0.006), and SMG7 (0.019 and 0.012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This revealed a prominent cluster of functional interactions (Fig. 4F) comprising NMD factor genes such as SMG5, SMG6, SMG7, UPF1 , and UPF3B , suggesting that the RPCO scores derived from CRISPR screens 67 are powerful for identifying NMD factors. Within this cluster were two candidate genes residing within 1q21.1-23.1, PMF1 and GON4L , showing notable codependency scores with SMG5 (0.06 and 0.0062, for PMF1 and GON4L , respectively) , SMG6 (0.02 and 0.006), and SMG7 (0.019 and 0.012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To pinpoint the potential causal gene from the 30 identified candidates, we considered genetic interactions inferred from gene-level CRISPR screening data obtained from the Achilles Project 66 , allowing to infer functional links between genes by studies of codependency profiles across cell lines. Here, we used the de-biased data ( onion method, RPCO), suggested for its power for inferring gene function 67 (see Methods). Our hypothesis posits that if these candidate genes 1q21-23.1 are indeed implicated in NMD efficiency, their CRISPR knockout fitness effect should correlate with established NMD factor genes like UPF1 , UPF2 , UPF3B , SMG1 , and others; the codependency implies a functional link.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, improvements regarding all metrics were less pronounced than for the lineage-based corrections (Figure 2a-d). Finally, we turned to a method that we and others had independently confirmed to perform very well on co-essentiality networks -data whitening with subsequent computation of pairwise PCCs (Hassan et al, 2023;Gheorghe & Hart, 2022;Rahman et al, 2021). Data whitening can be done with different sphering methods.…”
Section: Bacon Outperforms Existing Methods To Predict Gene Bufferingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarity between expression (co-expression) or genetic interaction signatures have been exploited to classify genes by their function in model organisms (Costanzo et al , 2016; Fischer et al , 2015; Collins et al , 2007; Eisen et al , 1998; Billmann et al , 2018; Costanzo et al , 2010). Following this concept, co-essentiality networks in human cells derived from genome-scale CRISPR screens from the Cancer Dependency Map (DepMap) enable systematic prediction of gene function as well (Wainberg et al , 2021; Hassan et al , 2023; Pan et al , 2022). The DepMap perturbs all approximately 18,000 genes in the human genome followed by the measurement of the effect of the perturbation on cell fitness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation