2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensionality and reliability of a screening instrument for students at-risk of dropping out from Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, democratizing access does not equate democratizing academic success, as these students present several difficulties when they have to face HE challenges (Adabaş and Kaygin, 2016;Casanova et al, 2018;Tight, 2019). This study illustrates more problems in academic adaptation and higher academic failure and dropout rates in low sociocultural subgroups (Díaz-Mujica et al, 2019;Casanova et al, 2021b). The problem is accentuated when these students are also not in a program and/or in an institution of first vocational option, due to a numerus clausus system on access (Fonseca et al, 2014;Ferrão and Almeida, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, democratizing access does not equate democratizing academic success, as these students present several difficulties when they have to face HE challenges (Adabaş and Kaygin, 2016;Casanova et al, 2018;Tight, 2019). This study illustrates more problems in academic adaptation and higher academic failure and dropout rates in low sociocultural subgroups (Díaz-Mujica et al, 2019;Casanova et al, 2021b). The problem is accentuated when these students are also not in a program and/or in an institution of first vocational option, due to a numerus clausus system on access (Fonseca et al, 2014;Ferrão and Almeida, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…His holistic approach points to teachers, academic staff, and peer relationships as relevant variables in the process of dropout decision-making. Research in this area evidences that student dropout can be related to personal characteristics (e.g., abilities, competencies, and motivations), family characteristics (e.g., first-generation students, sociocultural, and socioeconomic situation), academic background (e.g., previous achievement and vocational choices), and contextual characteristics (e.g., curriculum organization, size, and quality of institutions), among other ( Häfner et al, 2015 ; Lindblom-Ylänne et al, 2017 ; Casanova et al, 2021b ; Wangrow et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement in question was when the instrument was used to measure the same conditions will produce results that are not much different. Reliability is the consistency of instruments that provides the same information when tested repeatedly (Casanova et al, 2021;Ko et al, 2017;Sa'idah et al, 2019). The formula used to perform reliability tests on instruments with dichotomy properties is the Kudor Richardson formula (KR-20).…”
Section: Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, first year grades were found to be the best predictor of graduation at the University level (Willoughby et al, 2021). A host of psychological factors like academic exhaustion, satisfaction with education and dropout intention have also been explored as well (e.g., (Casanova et al, 2021)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%