2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensional structure, psychometric properties, and sex and ethnic invariance of a Bahasa Malaysia (Malay) translation of the Intuitive Eating Scale-2 (IES-2)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, while IA facets of Trusting, Attention Regulation, Emotional Awareness and Noticing from Mehling and colleagues' multidimensional conceptual model [6] are all represented to some extent within our EFA-derived model, the facets of Not-Distracting, Not-Worrying, Body Listening, and Self-Regulation are not. It is notable that some loss of facet and item coverage is common in test adaptation studies with Malay participants (e.g., [36,69]. It is possible that the results of the present study reflect the fact that the MAIA is based on a Western model of interoception that may not be fully applicable to non-Western samples.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, while IA facets of Trusting, Attention Regulation, Emotional Awareness and Noticing from Mehling and colleagues' multidimensional conceptual model [6] are all represented to some extent within our EFA-derived model, the facets of Not-Distracting, Not-Worrying, Body Listening, and Self-Regulation are not. It is notable that some loss of facet and item coverage is common in test adaptation studies with Malay participants (e.g., [36,69]. It is possible that the results of the present study reflect the fact that the MAIA is based on a Western model of interoception that may not be fully applicable to non-Western samples.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 78%
“…This was an important and necessary procedural step because it is possible that Malaysian cultural identities may have an impact upon the construct of IA [35] and the dimensionality of MAIA scores. For example, emerging evidence in the Malaysian context suggests that interoception-related constructs, such as one's hunger and satiety cues, may be conceptually complex compared to many Western populations [36].…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta‐analyses were conducted on total intuitive eating scores rather than on specific subscales. This decision was made because (a) only a minority of studies reported relationships for the specific subscales, (b) of those that did, different measures of intuitive eating were administered, each of which contain distinct subscale structures, and (c) subscale structures for existing intuitive eating measures have not always replicated in certain population groups (Swami et al, 2020; Vintilă et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta‐analytic review is necessary to more precisely characterize the nature, strength, and direction of these associations, and to clarify any inconsistencies observed within the literature. For example, significant negative relationships between intuitive eating and BMI have been reported in some studies (Tylka, Calogero, & Danielsdottir, 2015), but not others (Swami et al, 2020), while significant positive relationships between intuitive eating and self‐esteem have also been reported in certain studies (Alleva, Tylka, & Kroon Van Diest, 2017), but not in others (Vintilă et al, 2020). Furthermore, a meta‐analysis that identifies robust correlates of intuitive eating could also inform future prospective studies by narrowing down the list of plausible antecedents and consequences of intuitive eating that warrant additional investigation through these designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Beyond the parent study, support for this 4-factor structure of IES-2 scores has been equivocal. While some CFAbased studies have supported the 4-dimensional model [8,9], other research in diverse national and linguistic contexts has indicated that this model has less-than-adequate fit and, based on exploratory factor analyses (EFA), has instead proposed IES-2 models consisting of between three to six factors [10][11][12]. Difficulties confirming the fit of the 4-factor model have been attributed to concerns that the construct of intuitive eating itself, rather than the IES-2, may be problematic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%