1983
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(83)90437-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensional regularization and supersymmetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This regularization is consistent at low orders of perturbation theory as long as antisymmetric Levi-Civita tensors are not present, and manifestly preserves supersymmetry. (See the discussion in [35]. )…”
Section: Diagrams With E Iϕmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This regularization is consistent at low orders of perturbation theory as long as antisymmetric Levi-Civita tensors are not present, and manifestly preserves supersymmetry. (See the discussion in [35]. )…”
Section: Diagrams With E Iϕmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can easily verify that the sum 26) JHEP05 (2016)014 which is obtained after the gauge fixing procedure, is invariant under the background gauge transformations (2.11), under which f and ghost superfields should be transformed as…”
Section: Adjmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This regularization is mathematically consistent unlike the dimensional reduction [24]. (Removing the inconsistencies of the dimensional reduction leads to the loss of the explicit supersymmetry [25], which can be in this case broken by higher order quantum corrections [26][27][28].) The higher covariant derivative regularization can be formulated in the explicitly N = 1 supersymmetric way [29,30], so that it does not break supersymmetry.…”
Section: Jhep05(2016)014mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is well known that DRED is not mathematically consistent [20]. Its inconsistency leads to the loss of explicit SUSY [21], which will be broken by quantum corrections in higher loops [22,23]. Nevertheless, a recent analytical calculation [24] demonstrates that the DRED regularization and the DR scheme are working in the N = 4 SYM theory up to the four-loop approximation and give the vanishing result for its β-function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%