1997
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.36.5169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimension and Size Effects in Ferroelectrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
57
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
57
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the intrinsic size effect on ferroelectricity, [14][15][16] the influence of depolarizing field, 17,18 the surface tension effect, 8 and the surface bond contraction. 19 In ceramic materials, where individual crystallites are surrounded by a ferroelectric medium, the mechanical effect caused by the elastic three-dimensional ͑3D͒ clamping of crystallites may play an important role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the intrinsic size effect on ferroelectricity, [14][15][16] the influence of depolarizing field, 17,18 the surface tension effect, 8 and the surface bond contraction. 19 In ceramic materials, where individual crystallites are surrounded by a ferroelectric medium, the mechanical effect caused by the elastic three-dimensional ͑3D͒ clamping of crystallites may play an important role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately a thickness reduction from the macroscopic down to the mesoscopic regimes results in a change of polarization stability, although the polarization itself can be either inhibited or enhanced. [1][2][3][4][5][6] As the structural and polarization properties of these ultra thin films cannot readily be obtained by conventional techniques, there is a need for novel and reliable characterization techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 we show the normalized polarization (termed as the order parameter) as a function of film thickness normalized to the correlation length, ͑d / ͒. The value of for this particular composition was calculated to be 2.4 nm using parameters from Li 20 and Zembilgotov. 10 We also plot the predicted thickness dependence, from an intrinsic size effect model 9,10,20 (solid plot), from the macroscopic depoling field model 14,15 (dashed plot), and ab initio calculations for SRO/ BaTiO 3 / SRO (dotted plot).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%