1995
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8502(95)00005-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dilution of mainstream tobacco smoke and its effects upon the evaporation and diffusion of nicotine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…appropriate because the ratio of nicotine agreed closely with the results obtained by Lewis et al (1995) and Cochran et al (1995). Given that the gas ratio of nicotine is measured without considering volatilization, the ratio depends on the denuder length (10-30% with details shown in Figure S3b) and largely differs from that of the method with considering volatilization.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Multiple-ad-fp Methods And Filter-impisupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…appropriate because the ratio of nicotine agreed closely with the results obtained by Lewis et al (1995) and Cochran et al (1995). Given that the gas ratio of nicotine is measured without considering volatilization, the ratio depends on the denuder length (10-30% with details shown in Figure S3b) and largely differs from that of the method with considering volatilization.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Multiple-ad-fp Methods And Filter-impisupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The volatilization rate from the tobacco smoke particles with respect to tube length was obtained in the method, and the initial gas amount at the inlet of the denuders was calculated based on the volatilization rate. A number of researchers have used glass tube denuders (Lewis et al 1995;Hager and Niessner 1996;Mariner and Frost 1998;Ingebrethsem et al 2001;Cochran et al 2003;Lipowicz and Piade 2004;Katayama et al 2007). These research efforts took the influence of volatilization from the particles into consideration and analyzed the gas-particle distribution based on calculations; however, gas collection efficiencies and particle loss ratios were not sufficiently discussed in the papers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not possible at this time to distinguish between the two cited possible mechanisms based on the available data. Denuder tube experiments with fresh MS smoke (in the absence of a Cambridge filter pad) have demonstrated that nicotine is primarily in the particulate phase of MS smoke, that is, <1% of nicotine is in the gas phase of MS smoke (21,33,(52)(53)(54)(55). In addition, the Cambridge filter pad is 99.9% efficient for MS smoke particles that are larger than 0.1 :m in diameter (2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much more frequent sampling and analysis of all of the metabolites of nicotine would be required. Secondly, because we targeted a specific concentration of tobacco smoke (150 mg/m 3 ), substantial dilution was required, which effects the concentration and potentially the phase of nicotine (particulate vs. vapor; Lewis et al, 1995). Finally, in contrast to the cigarette smoke generated by human smokers, the age of the cigarette smoke in the rat inhalation studies is different because of the necessity of generation, dilution, and delivery to the exposure manifold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%