2020
DOI: 10.5958/2278-4853.2020.00028.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dilemma to decision: Human resource analytics for organisational performance-an empirical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The confirmatory factor analysis (Table 2) shows that the dimensional structure of these concepts is valid even in a non-western context. However, no significant relationship between protean and boundaryless career attitudes and organizational commitment was found [60][61][62][63]. No significant effects were observed on the dimensions of organizational commitment (AC, NC and CC) due to protean career attitudes (SD and VD).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The confirmatory factor analysis (Table 2) shows that the dimensional structure of these concepts is valid even in a non-western context. However, no significant relationship between protean and boundaryless career attitudes and organizational commitment was found [60][61][62][63]. No significant effects were observed on the dimensions of organizational commitment (AC, NC and CC) due to protean career attitudes (SD and VD).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have developed an interest in workplace spirituality and developed numerous theories (Kolodinsky, 2008;Milliman, 2003;Pawar, 2009) . Moreover, the positive impact of spirituality in the workplace is visible in terms of employee work Satisfaction (WS) (Lee, 2003), engagement (Roof, 2015), organizational commitment (Gatling et al, 2016), Job performance (Kumar, 2019;Lochab, 2020;Kumar, 2020), organizational performance (Lochab, 2021;Kumar, 2018) . Work has been done on Organizational productivity and group-level outcome (Fry and Matherly, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%