A Research Agenda for Management and Organization Studies 2016
DOI: 10.4337/9781784717025.00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital work: a research agenda

Abstract: IntroductionWe have been invited to discuss "digital work" and to propose a research agenda for the next decade or so. We value the opportunity to share some thoughts on this important area. In doing so, we will begin with a reconceptualization of the phenomenon that is at stake here, offer some specific examples, and then close by considering some possible future research directions that we hope will be both useful and generative. The phenomenon: What is digital work?The term "digital work" suggests that we a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent literature has highlighted the need to study work as it is the ‘micro-foundation’ of organizations and organizing (Barley & Kunda, 2001; Lawrence, Suddaby, & Leca, 2011; Orlikowski & Scott, 2016). Our focus on work also falls within a sociotechnical, practice perspective on organizing, which holds that reality is an active achievement involving human and non-human actors, rather than a pre-given fact (Latour, 2005; Leonardi, 2011; Orlikowski, 2010; Orlikowski & Scott, 2008; Riemer & Johnston, 2017).…”
Section: Connectivity Literature: From State To Skillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent literature has highlighted the need to study work as it is the ‘micro-foundation’ of organizations and organizing (Barley & Kunda, 2001; Lawrence, Suddaby, & Leca, 2011; Orlikowski & Scott, 2016). Our focus on work also falls within a sociotechnical, practice perspective on organizing, which holds that reality is an active achievement involving human and non-human actors, rather than a pre-given fact (Latour, 2005; Leonardi, 2011; Orlikowski, 2010; Orlikowski & Scott, 2008; Riemer & Johnston, 2017).…”
Section: Connectivity Literature: From State To Skillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orlikowski and Scott (2016) problematize the concept of practice as something that occurs in action and that can never be foreseen or predicted. Experience, knowledge, meaning, habits, norms are not fixed structures in an organization, but are instead continuously emerging during work and in relation to tools available and to the people involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unhinged, digital representations are amendable to subsequent algorithmic manipulations that fuel the recombination underpinning digital innovation (Henfridsson et al 2018, Yoo et al 2010. Increasingly self-referential, they gradually become the phenomena (Kallinikos 2007), or, more precisely, they become algorithmic phenomena (Orlikowski and Scott 2016). In our case, the physical phenomenon of the ice edge is gradually supplemented if not replaced by the algorithmic phenomenon of the ice edge.…”
Section: Contextsmentioning
confidence: 91%