Digital technology entrepreneurship in modern regional development

Abstract

Digital technology entrepreneurship is an important element of the transition to the digital economy, a factor of accelerating regional development. But this type of entrepreneurship has been studied insufficiently in the scientific literature. The aim of the study is to determine the impact of digital technology entrepreneurship on the development of Russian regions by clarifying its types and features. The methods of included observation, structural analysis, functional analysis, comparative analysis were used in the study. As a result, the definition of digital technology entrepreneurship is clarified, its categorization by four classification grounds is developed, the main features are established, the key directions of influence on the social and economic development of the region are identified. The recommendations on the accelerated development of digital process entrepreneurship in the regions are proposed and substantiated. The results of the study can be used by the authorities and universities developing digital technology entrepreneurship.

Digitalization Technology for Sustainable Rural Entrepreneurship and Inequality

“…The digital technology of entrepreneurship is an essential element of the transition to a digital economy and a key factor in accelerating regional development (Korchagina et al, 2019). This means the role and function are a conceptualization of digital entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial technology (Giones & Brem, 2017).…”

“…However, it could also disrupt welfare and increase social inequality (Morris et al, 2022;Ferrari et al, 2022). Digitalization technology helps create new job opportunities and supports economic growth (Korchagina et al, 2019;Savira & Fahmi, 2020;Mgadmi et al, 2021;Muafi et al, 2021;Sahut et al, 2021;Kasimov et al, 2021;Abeysinghe & Malik, 2021), but it also creates labor market fears and various inequalities (Qureshi, 2019;Yusuf, 2021;Bourguignon, 2022). Although previous studies showed persistent global digital inequality (Ho & Tseng, 2006), the positive impact could still be maximized to reduce the negative impact (Ferrari et al, 2022).…”