2020
DOI: 10.1177/1037969x20923073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital strip searches in Australia: A threat to the privilege against self-incrimination

Abstract: Law enforcement has experienced difficulties retrieving information stored on the mobile devices of suspects. Over the last years, a number of Australian jurisdictions enacted legislation that allows police officers to compel an individual to unlock their device (such as providing a PIN or fingerprint to unlock the device). Non-compliance with these legislative provisions is punishable by imprisonment. The refusal by suspects to comply with an order to unlock their devices has been addressed in a number of Aus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The regulations were highly controversial and met with very mixed responses. 59 The district courts, as well as doctrine representatives, are not unanimous, however, in their conclusions and some voices appeared that the privilege against self-incrimination should be reformulated for the purpose of adjusting criminal proceedings to new technological challenges. 60 As a result, the more impact and meaning will have developing the position on this subject by constitutional courts.…”
Section: Self -Incrimination and Lie-detecting Technologiesthe Emergi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regulations were highly controversial and met with very mixed responses. 59 The district courts, as well as doctrine representatives, are not unanimous, however, in their conclusions and some voices appeared that the privilege against self-incrimination should be reformulated for the purpose of adjusting criminal proceedings to new technological challenges. 60 As a result, the more impact and meaning will have developing the position on this subject by constitutional courts.…”
Section: Self -Incrimination and Lie-detecting Technologiesthe Emergi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, will the benefit of allowing the evidence outweigh the negative impact it might have for the accused? This can result in admission of evidence that may be obtained improperly or illegally due to its sufficient probative value (Adam and Barns, 2020). A judge also may, upon request of a party to proceedings, further warn a jury about the dangers of uncorroborated evidence if he or she considers the evidence (e.g., identification evidence or confession evidence) unreliable (Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) section 165 (1) (a)–(b); Odgers, 2018) In the cases discussed below, the court assessed whether to exercise their judicial discretion by analyzing claims of police impropriety and involuntariness.…”
Section: Procedures In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under such slogans, the legislation receives obvious preferences in relation to the law, which may carry some negative consequences of "legislative monopoly", gradually turning the legislation, according to legendary classics, exclusively into the "will of the ruling class. "For example, of interest is the opinion of Australian scholars discussing "the legislative activity and the reaction of the courts in the light of the privilege not to incriminate oneself" [12].…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%