2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital regolith mapping of clay across the Ashley irrigation area using electromagnetic induction data and inversion modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was the approach carried out by [43], who showed that in combination with EC ah or EC av of EM31, and EC ah or EC av of EM38 at a height of 0.6 m was optimal to make a LR with CEC at 0.3 m increments and to a depth of 2.0 m along a single transect. Alternatively, EC a data could be collected using a multiple-coil EM instrument such as a DUALEM-421 as shown by [44,45,46].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was the approach carried out by [43], who showed that in combination with EC ah or EC av of EM31, and EC ah or EC av of EM38 at a height of 0.6 m was optimal to make a LR with CEC at 0.3 m increments and to a depth of 2.0 m along a single transect. Alternatively, EC a data could be collected using a multiple-coil EM instrument such as a DUALEM-421 as shown by [44,45,46].…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although EM instruments only provide a bulk measurement of EC a , inversion is providing useful estimates of soil true electrical conductivity (σ, mS m −1 ), which can be used to calibrate soil properties at the same depths. Examples include calibration for soil salinity (Zare, Huang, Monteiro Santos, & Triantafilis, 2015), clay (Zhao et al., 2019), and cation exchange capacity (Koganti et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, CEC less than 20 cmol(+)kg −1 indicates poor shrink-swell, whereas CEC between 20 and 40 cmol(+)kg −1 suggests moderate shrink-swell potential. Moreover, the electrical conductivity of saturated soil paste extracts (EC e -dS m −1 ) can indicate recharge areas as a function of non-saline (EC e < 2 dS m −1 ) and discharge areas in highly saline (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) dS m −1 ) locations. Unfortunately, extensive soil characterisation is challenging, owing to time and the cost-prohibitive nature of sampling and analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given depth-specific information is required, newer approaches are essential to predict soil properties with the depth. A more recent study [10] showed how the inversion of Geonics (Geonics Ltd., Ontario, Canada) EM38 and EM34 EC a using EM4Soil software (EMTOMO, Lisboan, Portugal) can characterise clay at 1-m depth increments up to 12 m and across 40,000 ha in the nearby lower Gwydir Valley. In another study, Khognawang et al (2019) [11] used depth-specific estimates of true electrical conductivity (σ-mS m −1 ) inverted from EC a collected from an EM38 in order to develop a linear regression model to predict CEC at the field level and at 0.3-m increments to 0.9-m. Herein, we aim to characterise soil variation by depth along a 4-km section of a farm supply channel by (i) collecting DUALEM-421 EC a data; (ii) using EC a to inform a soil sample site selection; (iii) using the EM4soil software package to make electromagnetic conductivity images (EMCI) from the inversion of EC a ; (iv) determine the best set of inversion parameters (e.g., forward modelling, inversion algorithm and damping factor) to account for soil physical (clay and sand content) and chemical (EC e and CEC) properties and (v) use a support vector machine (SVM) to predict the soil properties from σ and understand how two-dimensional images can be used to identify more permeable prior stream channels and the implication for water management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%