Digital Nativity and Digital Diplomacy: Exploring Conceptual Differences Between Digital Natives and Digital Immigrants

Abstract

The past decade has seen the accelerated digitalization of foreign ministries. In this study, we conceptualize digitalization as long term process in which diplomats adopt different technologies to obtain foreign policy goals. To date, only a handful of studies have investigated which factors influence digitalization. This study sought to address this gap by examining generational gaps within foreign ministries, while investigating how such gaps may prevent diplomats from obtaining communicative goals. The study thus employed the concept of digital nativity, while examining operational and conceptual gaps between digital natives and immigrants. Using a sample of 133 diplomats from six foreign ministries, the study finds there are few operational gaps between natives and immigrants. There are, however, substantial conceptual gaps between both generations. Specifically, digital immigrants use social networking sites (SNS) for one-way message dissemination and influence and are also less likely to interact with, or value follower feedback. The same is not true of natives. Conceptual gaps may thus prevent foreign ministries from successfully marketing new policies online or gaining valuable insight that may be integrated into the policy formulation process. The study includes a series of policy recommendation that may help ministries of foreign affairs (MFAs) overcome gaps between natives and immigrants. | 443 DIGITAL NATIVITY AND DIGITAL DIPLOMACYends? To answer this question, we analyze a questionnaire disseminated among 133 diplomats. Our results demonstrate that there are important conceptual differences between generations.

Follow to be followed: The centrality of MFAs in Twitter networks

“…Ensuring the flow of information to algorithms is achieved through the promotion of two norms: the constant sharing of personal information and reciprocal following, or mutual surveillance. As stated earlier, in the digital society users crave the attention of their peers and conduct fetes to summon the gaze of Big Brother (Manor & Soone, 2018). Reciprocal following or mutual surveillance is an important mechanism as it urges users to follow one another and surveille one another.…”

“…The desire of many social media users is to be seen, liked, and retweeted into stardom. This logic is promoted by designating few social media users to the role of celebrities, or "twitteraties" (Manor & Soone, 2018). Those who obtain the highest degree of virality are catapulted into a life of luxury and become promotors of brands.…”

Methodology for Researching Digital Diplomacy in the New Era of Sustainable Development and Climate Change

“…According to Ilan Manor and Ronit Kampf, digital diplomacy refers mainly to the increasing use of social media platforms by a country to achieve its foreign policy goals and actively manage its image and reputation (Manor & Kampf, 2022). Thus, digital diplomacy as the use of digital communication tools (social media) by diplomats to communicate with each other and with the general public.…”

Reciprocity and asymmetry in digital diplomacy: Geopolitics of national identity in South Korea–Japan and South Korea–US relations

“…The use of specific features of the technology-its low-level affordances-is not quite as obviously reciprocal in their use. Instead, they may depend more on the personal predilections of a mission's social media personnel, embassy-level media strategies, and other considerations (Manor & Kampf, 2022).…”