Digital Natives’ Preferences on Mobile Artificial Intelligence Apps for Skin Cancer Diagnostics: Survey Study

Abstract

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown potential to improve diagnostics of various diseases, especially for early detection of skin cancer. Studies have yet to investigate the clear application of AI technology in clinical practice or determine the added value for younger user groups. Translation of AI-based diagnostic tools can only be successful if they are accepted by potential users. Young adults as digital natives may offer the greatest potential for successful implementation of AI into clinical practice, while at the same time, representing the future generation of skin cancer screening participants. Objective We conducted an anonymous online survey to examine how and to what extent individuals are willing to accept AI-based mobile apps for skin cancer diagnostics. We evaluated preferences and relative influences of concerns, with a focus on younger age groups. Methods We recruited participants below 35 years of age using three social media channels—Facebook, LinkedIn, and Xing. Descriptive analysis and statistical tests were performed to evaluate participants’ attitudes toward mobile apps for skin examination. We integrated an adaptive choice-based conjoint to assess participants’ preferences. We evaluated potential concerns using maximum difference scaling. Results We included 728 participants in the analysis. The majority of participants (66.5%, 484/728; 95% CI 0.631-0.699) expressed a positive attitude toward the use of AI-based apps. In particular, participants residing in big cities or small towns (P=.02) and individuals that were familiar with the use of health or fitness apps (P=.02) were significantly more open to mobile diagnostic systems. Hierarchical Bayes estimation of the preferences of participants with a positive attitude (n=484) revealed that the use of mobile apps as an assistance system was preferred. Participants ruled out app versions with an accuracy of ≤65%, apps using data storage without encryption, and systems that did not provide background information about the decision-making process. However, participants did not mind their data being used anonymously for research purposes, nor did they object to the inclusion of clinical patient information in the decision-making process. Maximum difference scaling analysis for the negative-minded participant group (n=244) showed that data security, insufficient trust in the app, and lack of personal interaction represented the dominant concerns with respect to app use. Conclusions The majority of potential future users below 35 years of age were ready to accept AI-based diagnostic solutions for early detection of skin cancer. However, for translation into clinical practice, the participants’ demands for increased transparency and explainability of AI-based tools seem to be critical. Altogether, digital natives between 18 and 24 years and between 25 and 34 years of age expressed similar preferences and concerns when compared both to each other and to results obtained by previous studies that included other age groups.

Attitudes and perception of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A cross-sectional survey among patients

“…Thus, we aimed to collect data on the respondent’s current awareness about AI, which is present without supplying additional external knowledge. Examinations on the consumers’ perceptions of AI in medicine are frequently carried out using online survey tools 36 , 37 or are based on analyses of social media. 38 These approaches offer a quick and simple generation of a big number of respondents, but it must not be overlooked that they are prone to methodological problems, 39 like in particular, a high risk of a selection bias excluding persons without internet access either through technical deficiencies or through missing skills.…”

Over-Detection of Melanoma-Suspect Lesions by a CE-Certified Smartphone App: Performance in Comparison to Dermatologists, 2D and 3D Convolutional Neural Networks in a Prospective Data Set of 1204 Pigmented Skin Lesions Involving Patients’ Perception

“…Our findings suggest that patients perceive great benefit from AI in skin cancer screening and that AI can assist dermatologists [ 30 , 43 ]. However, acceptance seems to be closely linked to the assumption that the decision-making of computer-assisted diagnostic systems is reliable, transparent, and comprehensible [ 31 , 44 ].…”

Mapping intellectual structures and research hotspots in the application of artificial intelligence in cancer: A bibliometric analysis

“…Comparing the visual diagnostic abilities of artificial intelligence and three dermatologists for skin cancer lesions, it was observed that the artificial intelligence model could better differentiate melanoma from non-melanoma, proving the model’s efficacy in discriminating pictures ( 44 ). Although AAIC is emerging in the field of skin cancer, it faces two problems: data set bias and problems in the technical application; the accepted population in translation into clinical practice is generally under the age of 35 ( 45 ). So AAIC needs more interpretability and engagement.…”