2013
DOI: 10.1002/cae.20464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital knowledge searching depth and individual creativity

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The research studies the relation of the learner's knowledge searching depth to his/her creativity when learner comes into contact with constructed knowledge. The digitized constructed knowledge environment has changed the way that knowledge has been presented through the books. By using information technology, learners now obtain knowledge rapidly in a computer-learning environment. When a learner facing a project, the way he/she searches information to build up his/her knowledge becomes a subject wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we contribute by showing the verse “U” shape between interaction length and team creativity evolution. While, network studies have shown that long interaction is beneficial for trust (Reagans & McEvily, ) and the transfer of the complex knowledge (Fei & Lin, ). In most network studies, researchers look at static and stable relations, which generally are at growth or maturity phase (Kratzer et al., ; Perry‐Smith, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, we contribute by showing the verse “U” shape between interaction length and team creativity evolution. While, network studies have shown that long interaction is beneficial for trust (Reagans & McEvily, ) and the transfer of the complex knowledge (Fei & Lin, ). In most network studies, researchers look at static and stable relations, which generally are at growth or maturity phase (Kratzer et al., ; Perry‐Smith, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research examined and found that firms and teams that are effective in deep interaction perform better (Meyer & Schermuly, ). For example, studies have regarded when advanced learners come into contact with knowledge, they prefer to knowledge searching depth (Fei & Lin, ). This implies that a certain length of interaction with others is required to get access to new knowledge and then improve creativity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the differences in learning performance when using cognitive styles as the grouping basis of online discussion and to provide future grouping of online discussion activities with a basis, as well as relevant suggestions, this study measured the cognitive styles of each student through Ford's SPQ (Clewley et al, 2010;Fei & Lin, 2013;Ford, 1985) and classified cognitive styles into three categories to perform a problem-solving based discussion activity. The detailed procedures were as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the differences in learning performance when using cognitive styles as the grouping basis of online discussion and to provide future grouping of online discussion activities with a basis, as well as relevant suggestions, this study measured the cognitive styles of each student through Ford's SPQ (Clewley et al., 2010; Fei & Lin, 2013; Ford, 1985) and classified cognitive styles into three categories to perform a problem-solving based discussion activity. The detailed procedures were as follows: Testing and grouping by SPQ scale: Testing with an SPQ scale was performed before the activity, and each student was classified into the holist group, serialist group, or intermediate group (i.e., students not particularly inclined to be holists or serialists) based on their SPQ score.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation