2021
DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2021.1942951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital inequality among older adults: explaining differences in the breadth of Internet use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over time, the term digital inequality has been used to encompass differences beyond access such as skills, uses, and outcomes (Büchi, 2017; DiMaggio & Hargittai, 2001; Hargittai, 2008; Robinson et al, 2015; van Dijk, 2013). Digital skills (Hargittai & Micheli, 2019), breadth of use (Leukel et al, 2021), and benefits such as connectedness (Zhou et al, 2021) or coping resources (van Ingen & Matzat, 2018) are consistently related to social background such that more privileged people tend to benefit more from their digital media use. There is much less work on harms as potential outcomes of digital media uses (e.g., Gangadharan, 2017; Gui & Büchi, 2021); what little exists has found mixed evidence of how these relate to socioeconomic status.…”
Section: From the Digital Divide To Digital Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, the term digital inequality has been used to encompass differences beyond access such as skills, uses, and outcomes (Büchi, 2017; DiMaggio & Hargittai, 2001; Hargittai, 2008; Robinson et al, 2015; van Dijk, 2013). Digital skills (Hargittai & Micheli, 2019), breadth of use (Leukel et al, 2021), and benefits such as connectedness (Zhou et al, 2021) or coping resources (van Ingen & Matzat, 2018) are consistently related to social background such that more privileged people tend to benefit more from their digital media use. There is much less work on harms as potential outcomes of digital media uses (e.g., Gangadharan, 2017; Gui & Büchi, 2021); what little exists has found mixed evidence of how these relate to socioeconomic status.…”
Section: From the Digital Divide To Digital Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous analysis of the New York City census re access to technology found predictors of internet access among older adults included younger ages, higher levels of formal education, higher income, and living with others ( González-Rivera and Finkelstein, 2021 ). Other studies report that people in poorer physical, emotional, and cognitive health are less likely to adopt ICT ( Crouch and Gordon, 2019 ; Leukel et al, 2021 ; Sixsmith et al, 2022 ). Among our informants, ICT adoption was not associated with younger age, higher education, and health conditions.…”
Section: Discussion: Moving Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Declining internet usage has been associated with growing age and those above age 75 are less likely to access the internet than those from the younger group of older adults (65–74) ( Smith, 2014 ; Crouch and Gordon, 2019 ; Sixsmith et al, 2022 ). Studies have also found that adults with higher educational status in early life were more likely to engage in internet use in later life ( Leukel et al, 2021 ). In addition, ICT adoption patterns are also influenced by an individuals’ physical and cognitive capability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 On the one hand, this could be due to rapid changes in digital technologies in that some internet-related terms from the original scale could be outdated. 49 On the other hand, the 14-and 10-item scales included terms related to various computer and internet domains, 51 but there is no guarantee that a person knowledgeable in one domain will be knowledgeable in another. 5 Hence, our finding that only the six-item scale demonstrates adequate structural validity is consistent with Hargittai and Hsieh's definition of internet skills and their goal of proposing scales that have fewer components but still optimally capture differences among respondents' web-use skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%