Geoheritage 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809531-7.00016-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital Geovisualisation Technologies Applied to Geoheritage Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The educational and tourist/recreation uses of geoheritage require a strong investment by the geopark management structure. The geopark staff should include experts on geosciences education and interpretation, in order to produce solid contents that support the educational and interpretative programmes of the geopark (Brilha, 2009;Buhay and Best, 2015;Cayla and Martin, 2018;Henriques et al, 2012;Macadam, 2018;Newsome and Dowling, 2018;Zouros et al, 2011). It is commonly accepted that, in many countries, the formal education on geosciences in schools is very deficient, resulting in societies with very low awareness for geoscientific topics (Stewart and Nield, 2013;Van Loon, 2008;Vasconcelos, 2016).…”
Section: Education and Interpretation Of Geoheritage In Geoparksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The educational and tourist/recreation uses of geoheritage require a strong investment by the geopark management structure. The geopark staff should include experts on geosciences education and interpretation, in order to produce solid contents that support the educational and interpretative programmes of the geopark (Brilha, 2009;Buhay and Best, 2015;Cayla and Martin, 2018;Henriques et al, 2012;Macadam, 2018;Newsome and Dowling, 2018;Zouros et al, 2011). It is commonly accepted that, in many countries, the formal education on geosciences in schools is very deficient, resulting in societies with very low awareness for geoscientific topics (Stewart and Nield, 2013;Van Loon, 2008;Vasconcelos, 2016).…”
Section: Education and Interpretation Of Geoheritage In Geoparksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the issue was raised much earlier, since geotourism was first formally defined and its linkages with geoconservation were recognized (Hose 1995(Hose , 2012. Recent developments seem to focus on technological innovations, and their successful application (Cayla 2014;Martin 2014;Aldighieri et al 2016;Cayla and Martin 2018) rather than on conceptual issues. In this paper, we bring the ergodic principle back into spotlight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among outdoor services, interpretation panels remain the most popular, despite a variety of problems associated with their design, erection and maintenance (Hughes and Ballantyne 2010;Macadam 2018). Nowadays, options to replace panels by mobile applications are explored as, despite various technical and perceptual problems, they are less intrusive (Reynard et al 2015;Cayla and Martin 2018). However, the key issue is what should be the interpretation content provided at geosites, whether by a panel or a Web-based resource.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from the definitions surrounding the subjects of geotourism, the real challenge is how to communicate this heritage and most of all, how to make it a recreational activity. A huge amount of scientific papers and research activities are devoted to these methods and represent the main vehicle of dissemination for cultural geoheritage [18,19]. This tendency has had exponential growth since 2001 [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%