2018
DOI: 10.1177/0309132518791734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital geographies of public art: New global politics

Abstract: Responding to geography’s digital and political turns, this article presents an original critical synthesis of the under-examined niche of networked geographies of public-art practices in today’s politicised digital culture. This article advances insights into digital public art as politics, and its role in politicising online public spaces with foci on: how digital technologies have instigated do-it-yourself modes for the co-creation of art content within peer-to-peer contexts; the way art is ‘stretched’ and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Where respondent-led photography was used -at case study sites 1 (Simpson's) & 2 (Southwell) --the project methodology was inspired by recent work on dialogical modes of knowledge production and dissemination (Castleden et al, 2008;Zebracki and Luger, 2018) and the potential of 'solicited or elicited photography' (McCarthy, 2013) to penetrate the activities through which 'place meaning' is constituted. We were interested in the potential of such approaches to address the power imbalance in researcher-researched relationships, enabling participants to carry out their own representational work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where respondent-led photography was used -at case study sites 1 (Simpson's) & 2 (Southwell) --the project methodology was inspired by recent work on dialogical modes of knowledge production and dissemination (Castleden et al, 2008;Zebracki and Luger, 2018) and the potential of 'solicited or elicited photography' (McCarthy, 2013) to penetrate the activities through which 'place meaning' is constituted. We were interested in the potential of such approaches to address the power imbalance in researcher-researched relationships, enabling participants to carry out their own representational work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These examples also demonstrate the intersections between digital media, religion, and gender. For example, some scholars have written about how social media allows for greater communication internationally and therefore can redefine what it means to "do" feminism (Baer 2016;Salime 2014;Tsuria 2020;Zebracki and Luger 2018). This not only has implications for the shared experiences of individuals within a religious community but could also potentially undergird moral concerns about technologies that have facilitated these changes.…”
Section: The Virtual Religious Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“Digital geographies” has taken human geography by storm. Within the last five years, a flurry of activities have coalesced under its banner, including an eponymous edited collection ( Digital Geographies ; Ash et al 2018a); two specialty groups (the Digital Geographies Specialty Group of the American Association of Geographers and the Digital Geographies Working Group of the RGS‐IB); a burgeoning of titular publications (e.g., Ford and Graham 2016; Ash et al 2018b; Elwood and Leszczynski 2018; Wilson 2018; McLean et al 2019; Zebracki and Luger 2019; McLean 2020); increasing use of “digital geography/ies” as a keyword to tag research outputs (e.g., Brydolf‐Horwitz 2018; Deckeyser 2018; Jefferson 2018; Richardson 2018; Cook 2019; Farries and Sturm 2019; Jefferson 2018; Richardson 2018); a proliferation of new faculty searches and appointments in digital geographies across flagship geography departments; themed keynote addresses at conferences (e.g., Stephens 2019); and a newly launched journal, Digital Geography and Society .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%