2020
DOI: 10.1111/cag.12632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Being genealogical in digital geographies

Abstract: In this intervention, I trace the genealogies of the recent heralding of digital geographies as a boundary object for scholarship and scholars foregrounding the digital in geography. Building off of previous efforts to be technopositional in digital geographies, I make an entreaty for further being genealogical by attuning to the insider/outsider positionalities that have informed this particular endeavour of intellectual community‐making in Anglo‐American geography. While genealogy is not an exercise in histo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, commercial videogames continue to exhibit forms of ‘Casual Empire’ by depoliticising and reframing colonial encounters as ‘adventure’ (Harrer 2018). Scepticism towards these games is compounded by the fact that digital encounters can be manipulated, misleading viewers with fabricated versions of nature (Louson 2021; Silk et al 2021). Furthermore, apps geared towards nature engagement often demonstrate a preoccupation with self-monitoring and competition—i.e., gamification (Arts et al 2021).…”
Section: Digital Encountersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, commercial videogames continue to exhibit forms of ‘Casual Empire’ by depoliticising and reframing colonial encounters as ‘adventure’ (Harrer 2018). Scepticism towards these games is compounded by the fact that digital encounters can be manipulated, misleading viewers with fabricated versions of nature (Louson 2021; Silk et al 2021). Furthermore, apps geared towards nature engagement often demonstrate a preoccupation with self-monitoring and competition—i.e., gamification (Arts et al 2021).…”
Section: Digital Encountersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, there are a variety of works that continue to unpack what the digital and digital geography is (e.g. Ash et al, 2019;Bork-Hüffer et al, 2021;Leszczynski, 2021). Our attention in this book, however, is to go beyond these epistemological discussions and instead to examine the emerging global challenges that are setting the research agenda in digital geographies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students entering our discipline remain ready to transcend barriers we have created, seeking boundary objects that enable this and the legitimation that such boundary-crossing scholarship is valued. The geographic information system (GIS)/critical geography debates of the 1990s created such objects, transforming GIS-informed research (Cope and Elwood, 2009; Elwood and Leszczynski, 2018; Kwan, 2002; Leszczynski, 2020; Wilson, 2017). Taking up such epistemological influences as engaged pluralism (Barnes and Sheppard, 2010), we can do this again, and again.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%