Digital capture, design, and manufacturing of a facial prosthesis: Clinical report on a pediatric patient

Grant, Gordon; Aita-Holmes, Cynthia; Liacouras, Peter; Garnes, Johnathan; Wilson, William

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.031

Cited by 31 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Various techniques have been used for making digital impressions in maxillofacial prosthetics, including laser optical scanning, 3D photography, and spectrophotogrammetry . However, the equipment required for such techniques is often not available.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

CAD/CAM‐Assisted Auricular Prosthesis Fabrication for a Quick, Precise, and More Retentive Outcome: A Clinical Report

Yadav

Narayan

Choudhry

et al. 2017

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Auricular defects comprise a large proportion of maxillofacial deformities. Most patients with acquired deformities have psychosocial ineptness and seek cosmetic rehabilitation. Although minor defects can be corrected surgically, extensive deformities are difficult to reconstruct with plastic surgery. Contrary to that, prosthetic restoration can provide excellent esthetic results. The conventional methods of maxillofacial prosthesis fabrication are time consuming and the outcome depends on the technician's skill. The advent of CAD/CAM technology in the field of dentistry has brought enormous improvement in the quality of health care provided. In the past decade, several methods have been described employing CAD/CAM techniques for the cosmetic rehabilitation of auricular defects. This clinical report details the integration of multiple digital technologies of CT scanning, computer aided design, and rapid prototyping to construct an ear prosthesis with limited number of appointments.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

CAD/CAM‐Assisted Auricular Prosthesis Fabrication for a Quick, Precise, and More Retentive Outcome: A Clinical Report

Yadav

Narayan

Choudhry

et al. 2017

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The protocol for craniofacial prosthesis design entails data capture and patient-specific design on a virtual platform, followed by fabrication and placement of the prosthetic organ. Digital capture and rapid prototyping is preferred over conventional waxing and impression schemes due to speed, commercialization, and unmatched accuracy in design 15…”

Section: Prosthesis Fabricationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Advancements in craniofacial prosthesis fabrication: A narrative review of holistic treatment

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The treatment of craniofacial anomalies has been challenging as a result of technological shortcomings that could not provide a consistent protocol to perfectly restore patient-specific anatomy. In the past, wax-up and impression-based maneuvers were implemented to achieve this clinical end. However, with the advent of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology, a rapid and cost-effective workflow in prosthetic rehabilitation has taken the place of the outdated procedures. Because the use of implants is so profound in different facets of restorative dentistry, their placement for craniofacial prosthesis retention has also been widely popular and advantageous in a variety of clinical settings. This review aims to effectively describe the well-rounded and interdisciplinary practice of craniofacial prosthesis fabrication and retention by outlining fabrication, osseointegrated implant placement for prosthesis retention, a myriad of clinical examples in the craniofacial complex, and a glimpse of the future of bioengineering principles to restore bioactivity and physiology to the previously defected tissue.

show abstract

“…Every detail was copied to the mould to ensure it is precise and fit to the face. Due this complicated fabrication process, specialists are needed to execute the fabrication [1,2] . In addition, a handmade silicone ear or nose can costs up to $4000, and requires 5 to 7 hospital visits for customization.…”

Section: Problem Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Computer Aided Facial Prosthetics Manufacturing System

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Facial deformities can impose burden to the patient. There are many solutions for facial deformities such as plastic surgery and facial prosthetics. However, current fabrication method of facial prosthetics is high-cost and time consuming. This study aimed to identify a new method to construct a customized facial prosthetic. A 3D scanner, computer software and 3D printer were used in this study. Results showed that the new developed method can be used to produce a customized facial prosthetics. The advantages of the developed method over the conventional process are low cost, reduce waste of material and pollution in order to meet the green concept.

show abstract

Digital capture, design, and manufacturing of a facial prosthesis: Clinical report on a pediatric patient

Cited by 31 publications

References 7 publications

CAD/CAM‐Assisted Auricular Prosthesis Fabrication for a Quick, Precise, and More Retentive Outcome: A Clinical Report

CAD/CAM‐Assisted Auricular Prosthesis Fabrication for a Quick, Precise, and More Retentive Outcome: A Clinical Report

Advancements in craniofacial prosthesis fabrication: A narrative review of holistic treatment

Computer Aided Facial Prosthetics Manufacturing System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About