2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-022-00581-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital approaches to enhancing community engagement in clinical trials

Abstract: Digital approaches are increasingly common in clinical trial recruitment, retention, analysis, and dissemination. Community engagement processes have contributed to the successful implementation of clinical trials and are crucial in enhancing equity in trials. However, few studies focus on how digital approaches can be implemented to enhance community engagement in clinical trials. This narrative review examines three key areas for digital approaches to deepen community engagement in clinical trials—the use of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding data collection methods, the findings shown by studies comparing selfadministered virtual data collection methods and traditional paper-pencil data collection methods were taken into account. This mechanism proved to be consistent with the findings of traditional methods for the population characteristics distribution, adjustment and data quality (Gosling et al 2004;Tan et al 2022;Woodyatt et al 2016).…”
Section: Data Collectionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Regarding data collection methods, the findings shown by studies comparing selfadministered virtual data collection methods and traditional paper-pencil data collection methods were taken into account. This mechanism proved to be consistent with the findings of traditional methods for the population characteristics distribution, adjustment and data quality (Gosling et al 2004;Tan et al 2022;Woodyatt et al 2016).…”
Section: Data Collectionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Community engaged research has been reluctant to adopt a virtual model because of the distinctive features of established rapport, relationships, and investment in communities that have traditionally characterized in-person activities. [23][24][25][26] While virtual engagement is not an inperson replacement, it is a new modality that can be leveraged to expand access, increase equity, improve trust building, and enhance the delivery and implementation of CEnR. Therefore, engagement activities that take place virtually, need to reflect a set of best practices that allow for equitably involving community members, organizational representatives, and researchers throughout the process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some digital crowdsourcing interventions have been designed to increase participation from women, ethnic minorities, and other underrepresented groups. (72)(73)(74) At the same time, several studies suggest that socio-economically disadvantaged groups have lower uptake of online STI testing, (75,76) or other device. Research using low-cost platforms for analogue phones are needed to spur innovation focused on low-income users.…”
Section: Digital Sexual Health and Health Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%