1981
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3991(81)90022-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digital acquisition and processing of electron micrographs using a scanning transmission electron microscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5), and therefore raise the question about the existence of systematic errors. To this end, we can exclude preferential adsorption of salts, detergent, or small polypeptides to the protein structures, since the mass-per-length measured for tobacco mosaic virus coincided with the theoretical value within 10% (see Engel et al, 1981). In addition, our estimate for the contribution of the embracing nuclear envelope to the mass of intact membrane-bound NPCs (see Materials and Methods) appears to be correct, since their corrected mass (i.e., 124 + 11 MD) closely matches that of intact but membrane-detached NPCs (i.e., 125 + 12 MD).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5), and therefore raise the question about the existence of systematic errors. To this end, we can exclude preferential adsorption of salts, detergent, or small polypeptides to the protein structures, since the mass-per-length measured for tobacco mosaic virus coincided with the theoretical value within 10% (see Engel et al, 1981). In addition, our estimate for the contribution of the embracing nuclear envelope to the mass of intact membrane-bound NPCs (see Materials and Methods) appears to be correct, since their corrected mass (i.e., 124 + 11 MD) closely matches that of intact but membrane-detached NPCs (i.e., 125 + 12 MD).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass determination by STEM thus became a powerful tool for the analysis of macromolecular assemblies (Engel, 1978;Wall, 1979). Since then the data acquisition (Engel et al, 1981;Wall et al, 1973), software and specimen preparation for mass determination has been improved and continuously applied to biological macromolecules and assemblies thereof Engel, 1998, 2001;Wall and Simon, 2001;Wall et al, 1998). Indeed, the dedicated STEM has become a valuable tool in biophysical research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The mass of the LP complex was computed from integrated scattered intensity inside a circle slightly larger than the LP complex diameter (=350 A). For unknown reasons, the TMV was not an adequate standard (17) in measuring the masses of hook-containing complexes. For these structures, three sets of measurements were made: (i) total scattering intensity of the particle IHC, (ii) hook linear scattering intensity IH/L, and (iii) hook length LH.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%