2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Digit ratio (2D:4D) and the spatial representation of magnitude

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
31
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
9
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In IPV perpetrators, the 2D:4D ratio of the left hand was smaller than controls. For this reason, our results support previous research because the 2D:4D ratio of both hands has been used as index of masculinization (Bull & Benson, 2006;. Therefore, IPV perpetrators may have been exposed to high prenatal T levels (Manning et al, 2001) and may also present an increased genetic sensitivity (Manning et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In IPV perpetrators, the 2D:4D ratio of the left hand was smaller than controls. For this reason, our results support previous research because the 2D:4D ratio of both hands has been used as index of masculinization (Bull & Benson, 2006;. Therefore, IPV perpetrators may have been exposed to high prenatal T levels (Manning et al, 2001) and may also present an increased genetic sensitivity (Manning et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…No conclusive results affirm that the left-hand 2D:4D ratio is not sensitive to the effects of prenatal androgens. Thus, our results reinforce those found in other studies that show relationships or predictions associated with the left indicator (Bull & Benson, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…[26] In the present study, significant relationships with 2D:4D ratios were not observed during the performance of any of the tests for cognition. The results of the present study were in concurrence with the reports of Bull and Benson and Austin et al [3,22,23] The strengths of the study include the measurement of 2D:4D ratio in a precise manner using the digital Vernier calipers. However, variations in results obtained in the present study could be attributed to factors such as ethnicity and limitations such as choice of sample, smaller sample size, and choice of tests for assessment of cognition used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…[26,27] On the contrary, females (higher 2D:4D ratios) outscored males on picture free recall and picture placement in the study by Mary et al [19] The abovementioned study also used the same tests as the present study to assess free and placement recall. Interestingly, lower 2D:4D ratios (masculine ratios) correlated with the better spatial recall in the studies conducted by Bull and Benson and Peters et al [3,12] However, most of the previous studies that reported a significant correlation with lower 2D:4D ratios in this domain have used mental rotation performance tasks for the evaluation of spatial skills. [12] The lack of significant correlations in the present study could be attributed to the difference in methodology and smaller sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation