2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusional evolution of precipitates in elastic media using the extended finite element and the level set methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most of these methods typically require tools not frequently available in standard finite element and finite difference software packages. Examples of such approaches include the extended and composite finite element methods (e.g., [31,12,23,13,32,55,7,4]), immersed interface methods (e.g., [40,43,60,44,65]), virtual node methods with embedded boundary conditions (e.g., [3,73,34]), matched interface and boundary methods (e.g., [71,68,69,67,72]), modified finite volume/embedded boundary/cut-cell methods/ghost-fluid methods (e.g., [27,36,19,25,26,35,47,70,48,37,46,64,49,9,10,52,53,33,63]). In another approach, known as the fictitious domain method (e.g., [28,29,56,45]), the original system is either augmented with equations for Lagrange multipliers to enforce the boundary conditions, or the penalty method is used to enforce the boundary condi-tions weakly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of these methods typically require tools not frequently available in standard finite element and finite difference software packages. Examples of such approaches include the extended and composite finite element methods (e.g., [31,12,23,13,32,55,7,4]), immersed interface methods (e.g., [40,43,60,44,65]), virtual node methods with embedded boundary conditions (e.g., [3,73,34]), matched interface and boundary methods (e.g., [71,68,69,67,72]), modified finite volume/embedded boundary/cut-cell methods/ghost-fluid methods (e.g., [27,36,19,25,26,35,47,70,48,37,46,64,49,9,10,52,53,33,63]). In another approach, known as the fictitious domain method (e.g., [28,29,56,45]), the original system is either augmented with equations for Lagrange multipliers to enforce the boundary conditions, or the penalty method is used to enforce the boundary condi-tions weakly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, particle merging and splitting phenomena, which are common for particles during the phase transformations, cannot be captured easily in those BIM-based approaches. Recently, Duddu et al (Duddu et al, 2011) revisited this problem based on the same mathematical model using a combined extended finite element method (XFEM) and level set method (LSM), in which the geometry of interface was implicitly defined by the level set function so that topological changes could be easily handled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employ a sharp interface model based on a hybrid extended finite element and level set method that naturally allows complex topological changes during the morphological evolution without requiring remeshing. The level set method, originally devised for tracking moving interfaces (Osher and Sethian, 1988), is capable of describing complicated geometrical interfaces of microstructures, such as dendritic solidification (Chen et al, 1997;Zabaras et al, 2006), precipitate evolution (Duddu et al, 2011) and biofilm growth (Duddu et al, 2008;Duddu et al, 2009).. The combined method enables the handling of complex morphological transformations of multiple misfitting inhomogeneities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%