2018
DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.08.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in lymph node staging for prostate cancer

Abstract: In patients with prostate cancer, the presence of lymph node (LN) metastases is a critical prognostic factor and is essential for treatment planning. Conventional cross-sectional imaging performs poorly for nodal staging as both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are mainly dependent on size and basic morphological criteria. Therefore, extended pelvic LN dissection (ePLND) remains the gold standard for LN staging, however, it is an invasive procedure with its own drawbacks, thus crea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the literature on response assessment is dominated by studies using RECIST 1.1 criteria [ 18 ], which depend primarily on changes in lesion dimensions and are applicable to primary, nodal, and visceral sites, but not for bone metastases. As these same criteria are followed for primary, nodal, and visceral sites under MET-RADS-P, the moderate to substantial inter-observer agreement seen in the primary/dominant RAC assessment of node regions likely reflects known difficulties in assessing nodes with MRI, which is dependent on nodal size assessments [ 19 , 20 ]. Third, for interpretation of bone metastases, the MET-RADS-P guidelines consider alterations in both size and ADC values, providing extra information that likely increases the performance and inter-observer agreement for bone metastases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the literature on response assessment is dominated by studies using RECIST 1.1 criteria [ 18 ], which depend primarily on changes in lesion dimensions and are applicable to primary, nodal, and visceral sites, but not for bone metastases. As these same criteria are followed for primary, nodal, and visceral sites under MET-RADS-P, the moderate to substantial inter-observer agreement seen in the primary/dominant RAC assessment of node regions likely reflects known difficulties in assessing nodes with MRI, which is dependent on nodal size assessments [ 19 , 20 ]. Third, for interpretation of bone metastases, the MET-RADS-P guidelines consider alterations in both size and ADC values, providing extra information that likely increases the performance and inter-observer agreement for bone metastases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, bilateral LNM were detected more frequently in high‐risk (16%) than intermediate‐risk (1.3%) cases, suggesting an association with aggressive PCa 31 which identified with our bPFS result. Conventional MRI based on size and basic morphological criteria showed a poor result about nodal staging, 32 however, mp‐MRI could improve diagnostic performance about cN staging by using DWI correlated with anatomical T2 images 33 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional sequences of mpMRI has been advocated for identifying malignant nodes, particularly using ADC values, but conflicting results were reported because of significant overlap between benign and malignant LN ADC. 23 New node staging perspectives include the use of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide (USPIOs), phagocytosed by macrophages in circulation, and are taken up by lymphatics into lymph nodes, in order to perform a magnetic resonance lymphography (MRL). 24 In this contest, role of DWI in combination with MRL could apport further benefits showing sensitivity values 25 between 65% and 75% and specificity values of 93%-96%.…”
Section: Predicting Extracapsular (Extraprostatic) Extension (Ece) and Nodal Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%