2007
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2007.10473332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion of Technology Innovation in the Preservice Social Studies Experience: Results of a National Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of quality professional development, school policies that fail to support mobile technology use, instructors' beliefs about the role of technology in the curriculum, and cultures that are just not supportive of mobile computing adoption have made the integration of mobile initiatives problematic in U.S. schools and universities. Many researchers and authors conclude from their experience that technology integration of any kind has been sparsely achieved, if at all (Bauer & Kenton, 2005;Bolick, Berson, Friedman, & Porfeli, 2007;Er & Kay, 2005;Franklin & Molebash, 2007;Hew & Brush, 2007;Lawless & Pellegrino, 2007). Other researchers believe that technology integration has been achieved more in some segments of industry and society than others (Drucker, 2006;Hughes & Ooms, 2004;Judge, Puckett, & Cabuk, 2004;Swain & Pearson, 2003).…”
Section: The Adoption Of Technological Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of quality professional development, school policies that fail to support mobile technology use, instructors' beliefs about the role of technology in the curriculum, and cultures that are just not supportive of mobile computing adoption have made the integration of mobile initiatives problematic in U.S. schools and universities. Many researchers and authors conclude from their experience that technology integration of any kind has been sparsely achieved, if at all (Bauer & Kenton, 2005;Bolick, Berson, Friedman, & Porfeli, 2007;Er & Kay, 2005;Franklin & Molebash, 2007;Hew & Brush, 2007;Lawless & Pellegrino, 2007). Other researchers believe that technology integration has been achieved more in some segments of industry and society than others (Drucker, 2006;Hughes & Ooms, 2004;Judge, Puckett, & Cabuk, 2004;Swain & Pearson, 2003).…”
Section: The Adoption Of Technological Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for other concerns, lack of quality professional development, school policies that fail to support mobile technology use, instructors' beliefs about the role of technology in the curriculum, and cultures that are just not supportive of mobile computing adoption have made the integration of mobile initiatives problematic in U.S. schools and universities. Many researchers and authors conclude from their experience that technology integration of any kind has been sparsely achieved, if at all (Bauer & Kenton, 2005;Bolick, Berson, Friedman, & Porfeli, 2007;Franklin & Molebash, 2007;Hew & Brush, 2007;Lawless & Pellegrino, 2007). Other researchers believe that technology integration has been achieved more in some segments of industry and society than others (Drucker, 2006;Hughes & Ooms, 2004;Judge, Puckett, & Cabuk, 2004;Swain & Pearson, 2003).…”
Section: Direct Impact On Student Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One area has been teacher-centered uses of technology in social studies (e.g., Doppen, 2004 ;Friedman & Hicks, 2006 ;VanFossen & Berson, 2008 ;Whitworth & Berson, 2003 ;Zhao & Hoge, 2004 ) where researchers have described and examine how teachers have integrated speci fi c technology into social studies classrooms. The second area has been the preparation of preservice teachers to use technology in social studies (e.g., Bolick, Berson, Friedman, & Porfeli, 2007 ;Brush & Saye, 2009 ;Crowe, 2004 ;Diem, 2002 ;Mason et al, 2000 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%