1959
DOI: 10.1139/v59-237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DIFFUSION OF Ni63 IN IRON, COBALT, NICKEL, AND TWO IRON–NICKEL ALLOYS

Abstract: The self-diffusion of nickel and the diffusion of NiG3 into iron, cobalt, and two iro11-nickel alloys was studied using the technique of decrease in surface activity, T l~e nickel selfdiffusion results arc compared to previo~rsly reported values. Nickel is found to diffuse more slowly than iron in the iron-rich portion of the iron-nicltel system. The rate of niclcel diffusion increases with increasing nickel content. . A comparison is made between the present results for diffusion of Nim into iron, cobalt, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low energy of nickel-63 makes the isotope most suitable for the residual activity method, the validity of which has been discussed by Mackliet (1958) in connection with his study of nickel diffusion in copper. Although MacEwan et al (1959) employed the surface decrease method with nickel-63 they showed that the radiation from the surface of the Fe-Ni alloys originated from depths no greater than +p. This figure lends weight to the suggestion of Leymonie (1963) that no corrections are necessary for absorption if the layers removed are greater than 2p.…”
Section: The Selection Of a Methods For The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The low energy of nickel-63 makes the isotope most suitable for the residual activity method, the validity of which has been discussed by Mackliet (1958) in connection with his study of nickel diffusion in copper. Although MacEwan et al (1959) employed the surface decrease method with nickel-63 they showed that the radiation from the surface of the Fe-Ni alloys originated from depths no greater than +p. This figure lends weight to the suggestion of Leymonie (1963) that no corrections are necessary for absorption if the layers removed are greater than 2p.…”
Section: The Selection Of a Methods For The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…2, the calculated Co impurity diffusion in fcc-Ni compares favorably with all available experimental data. [23,25,27,28] The experimental data for the impurity diffusivity of Ni in fcc-Co lie within a narrow band, [23,25,[29][30][31] as shown by the Arrhenius plot of the Ni diffusion in fcc-Co in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Assessment Of Atomic Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…3) was mainly based on the work of Million and Kucera [31] and a recommended value at 1100°C, supplemented with a compromise made among three measurements. [25,29,30] The recommended value is 1.0 Â 10 -15 (m 2 /s), and was derived from a wide variety of experimental measurements either by extrapolating or eye guide. [30][31][32][33][34][35] The calculated tracer diffusivity of Co in the Co-Ni binary alloys is shown to be dependent on the Ni content in Fig.…”
Section: Assessment Of Atomic Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MacEwan e t al. [14] t C i.T 3, Prom the thermodynamic relations AY = --and C = €1 -TI9 we obtain r H trivacancies. The mathematical problem is then to find a least square approximation to the measured diffusion coefficients by a function…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…= 10, Sy = 0.84 k , and ' ' = 0.6 into(14), we obtain v2, exp S f l k vl0 exp S y / k exp AS2jk = 1 . 7 6 .A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%