2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1369-8001(00)00036-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion of ion-implanted boron impurities into pre-amorphized silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, B + ions were implanted in strained Si/strained Si 0.5 Ge 0.5 /SSOI heterostructures implanted (amorphized) before with Si + ions, (Si + +B + ), a method previously used for USJ formation in pure Si and Ge. 21 The implantation parameters were selected based on SILVACO simulations, by computing molecular implants of BF 2 + . We have selected implantation energies of 1.5 keV and 6 keV, corresponding to a common mean H45 projected ion range, R p , of 8.5 nm for both B + and BF 2 + .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, B + ions were implanted in strained Si/strained Si 0.5 Ge 0.5 /SSOI heterostructures implanted (amorphized) before with Si + ions, (Si + +B + ), a method previously used for USJ formation in pure Si and Ge. 21 The implantation parameters were selected based on SILVACO simulations, by computing molecular implants of BF 2 + . We have selected implantation energies of 1.5 keV and 6 keV, corresponding to a common mean H45 projected ion range, R p , of 8.5 nm for both B + and BF 2 + .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the use of ion beams to purposely pre-amorphize semiconductors is preferred in order to better control the spatial distribution of the implanted dopants. Indeed, when ion implantation is performed on a crystalline material, the dopant profile is more difficult to predict due to effects such as ion channelling [20]. In fact, it has been shown that using a pre-amorphized semiconductor before performing ion beam doping ultimately leads to better performance of the processed semiconductor after annealing [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] This research has been motivated by the requirement in advanced CMOS technologies to minimize boron diffusion for the formation of shallow source/drain junctions and sharply defined halo profiles. 19,20 The minimization of boron diffusion is also important in bipolar transistors, where boron diffusion limits the achievable base width and hence the value of cutoff frequency that can be obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] A chemical interaction between boron and fluorine has been proposed to explain the suppression of boron transient enhanced diffusion by fluorine, 4,9,11,14,16 in which the fluorine combines with interstitial boron reducing its mobility 4,11,14,16 or reduces the probability of formation of a boron interstitial pair. 9,11 Alternatively, the formation of vacancy-fluorine complexes has been proposed, 13,17,18,[23][24][25][26] which act as a barrier for boron diffusion, 13 or suppress the interstitial concentration and hence reduce boron transient enhanced diffusion 17 and thermal diffusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%