2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion of deuterium in Zr–2.5Nb alloy under neutron irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only hydrogen diffusion coefficient for irradiated Zr-2.5Nb found in the literature [44] does not differ from those measured in unirradiated materials. It is known that irradiation affects the Nb percentage in b phase [15], reaching a limit of about 32%Nb (nearly 50% of the initial value) after a fluence of 5 Â 10 25 n/m 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only hydrogen diffusion coefficient for irradiated Zr-2.5Nb found in the literature [44] does not differ from those measured in unirradiated materials. It is known that irradiation affects the Nb percentage in b phase [15], reaching a limit of about 32%Nb (nearly 50% of the initial value) after a fluence of 5 Â 10 25 n/m 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Besides, the hydrogen diffusion coefficient change with Nb percentage of b phase when the material is heat treated. In the work of Khatamian [44] the dose received by the specimens was about 2 Â 10 24 n/m 2 which scarcely would produce changes in Nb concentration of b phase lower than 10% (Fig. 11 in [15]), this could explain why no differences were detected in [44] for hydrogen diffusion of irradiated and unirradiated specimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nevertheless, the variability of the material parameters concerning the hydrogen diffusion and solubility limit is high from one study to the other. For instance, more than 50% variability in the diffusion coefficient has been reported (comparison of data in [34,35,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]). A calculation considering an increase by 30% of the diffusion coefficient results in a 300 µm blister in 20h (Figure 6(d)).…”
Section: Optimized Thermal Conditions For Blister Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%