2007
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a0488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffusion Anisotropy Measurement of Brain White Matter Is Affected by Voxel Size: Underestimation Occurs in Areas with Crossing Fibers

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Voxel size/shape of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) may directly affect the measurement of fractional anisotropy (FA) in regions where there are crossing fibers. The purpose of this article was to investigate the effect of voxel size/shape on measured FA by using isotropic and nonisotropic voxels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
166
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
166
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the finding of distributed changes in axial diffusivity is more likely because of differences in the size, number, or arrangement of axons in the ketamine group, as opposed to differences in myelination. Although oligodendrocytes are thought to modulate a significant proportion of the radial diffusivity, this relationship does not always hold in situations where the local topology of white matter includes areas of crossing fibers or voxel size (Alexander and Seunarine, 2010;Oouchi et al, 2007). A possible explanation for observing only axial differences may be that localized glutamate excitotoxicity would affect oligodendrocytes and hence radial diffusivity in a focal region, but could potentially propagate over a much larger area while affecting axons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the finding of distributed changes in axial diffusivity is more likely because of differences in the size, number, or arrangement of axons in the ketamine group, as opposed to differences in myelination. Although oligodendrocytes are thought to modulate a significant proportion of the radial diffusivity, this relationship does not always hold in situations where the local topology of white matter includes areas of crossing fibers or voxel size (Alexander and Seunarine, 2010;Oouchi et al, 2007). A possible explanation for observing only axial differences may be that localized glutamate excitotoxicity would affect oligodendrocytes and hence radial diffusivity in a focal region, but could potentially propagate over a much larger area while affecting axons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, four non-diffusion (b 0 ) images were acquired during each scan session, then manually averaged to improve signal to noise ratio. Sixty non-collinear diffusion directions and isotropic voxels were used to improve angular resolution and data integrity (anisotropic voxels in diffusion acquisition can affect tensor modeling and artificially alter FA values (Oouchi et al, 2007)). Finally, well-established diffusion analysis methods were used to calculate FA value, and a rigorous statistical threshold was applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.0 × 2.0 × 2.0 mm 3 while trying to compensate for an acceptable SNR and scan time. We chose isotropic voxel based on its advantages over non-isotropic voxels (Jones et al 2002;Sasaki 2007;Oouchi et al 2007). We also chose the lowest and highest b-values (700 and 1200 s/mm 2 , respectively) which were testified from previous work that those are the optimal b-value for brain imaging as well as the common b-value used, which is 1000 s/mm 2 (Bougias &Tripoliti 2009;Mori 2007;Mukherjee et al 2008a).…”
Section: Discussion Imaging Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%