1994
DOI: 10.1016/0167-2738(94)90127-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffuse neutron scattering of iron-doped nickel oxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case a Fe 3+ ion occupying interstitial site is coordinated to 4 Ni vacancies. Such a defect structure in Fe doped NiO was predicated by theoretical studies [17] and indicated by neutron scattering experiments [21]. Similar is the situation with Mn and Co doping, where the defect structure in MnO and CoO is expected to be reflected in the structure of NiO if doped by Mn or Co.…”
Section: Evolution Of Structure and Microstructure Of Nio With Transisupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In this case a Fe 3+ ion occupying interstitial site is coordinated to 4 Ni vacancies. Such a defect structure in Fe doped NiO was predicated by theoretical studies [17] and indicated by neutron scattering experiments [21]. Similar is the situation with Mn and Co doping, where the defect structure in MnO and CoO is expected to be reflected in the structure of NiO if doped by Mn or Co.…”
Section: Evolution Of Structure and Microstructure Of Nio With Transisupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In a study of iron doped NiO, which also has been studied by diffuse scattering experiments, the case of a "dilute wustite" seems to be realized. Observations are very similar to pure Fe,-10 particularly showing that Fe interstitials are surrounded by cation vacancies [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In a similar way, ∼15 nm size Mn-doped NiO NPs have shown FM properties, 21–28 nm shows SPM/AF properties, and 50 nm becomes PM . The above discrepancies in the magnetic properties have been attributed to the contribution from the magnetization resulting from (i) the finite size resulting in enhanced surface effect, (ii) the segregation of secondary TM-related impurity phases, (iii) double exchange interactions through substitutional TM ions at octahedral Ni site and charge carriers from defects, (iv) interstitially doped TM ions at tetrahedral site resulting in the formation of 4:1 defect cluster, ,, and (v) intraparticle interactions . Apart from above, the reported discrepancies in the magnetic properties could also be a consequence of a lack of a standard methodology for defining the RT magnetic properties, since simply having a nonzero value of coercivity and remanence at RT could possibly originate from spurious phases and point defects or could be related to SPM properties that may have a Curie temperature below RT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%