Abstract:Abstract. Diffractive meson production at HERA offers interesting possibilities to investigate diffractive processes and thus to learn something about the properties of the pomeron. The most succesful phenomenological description of the pomeron so far assumes it to couple like a C = +1 isoscalar photon to single quarks. This coupling leads, however, to problems for exclusive diffractive reactions. We propose a new phenomenological pomeron vertex, which leads to very good fits to the known data, but avoids the … Show more
“…It turns out that the DL model in its original form also violates electromagnetic current conservation in this process, as was already remarked in [14]. For the γ * p cross section one…”
Section: Exclusive Production Of Vector Mesonsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This choice was made in [9] and [4,10,11]. One may argue that the coupling should be taken as perturbative at both upper vertices, then there is no square root in (14), (17). A similar comment holds for vector meson production (30).…”
Section: Comparison Of the DL And Ln Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At t = 0 the longitudinal polarisation vector readsε µ 0 = Q/(∆ · q) · ∆ µ to leading order in ξ −1 , and it is easy to see that the sum of the first and the second term in the brackets of (14) gives an amplitude proportional to L 2 for longitudinal photons. For transverse photons the amplitude is proportional to L 1 in the case m q = 0 when only the first term contributes, and it involves both loop integrals for finite quark mass due to the third term.…”
Section: Comparison Of the DL And Ln Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the differences let us compare the values of L 1 , L 2 and K in some kinematical limits, keeping in mind that there is also an additional root of α s (λ 2 )/α (0) s in (14). We always assume that µ …”
Section: Comparison Of the DL And Ln Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The starting point of [14] is a pomeron with a vector coupling and a sign factor to ensure C = +1 exchange; a scalar term accompanied with specific sign instructions is then added to the γ µ -part of the coupling in order to restore current conservation in vector meson production. For a programme of investigating the general structure of the pomeron-quark vertex we refer to [21].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Approachesmentioning
The pomeron model of Donnachie and Landshoff does not conserve the electromagnetic current when applied to diffractive reactions such as electroproduction of a quarkantiquark pair or of a vector meson. We propose a treatment of this problem which ensures a physical behaviour of cross sections in the photoproduction limit and show that it leads to results rather similar to those obtained from two-gluon exchange.
“…It turns out that the DL model in its original form also violates electromagnetic current conservation in this process, as was already remarked in [14]. For the γ * p cross section one…”
Section: Exclusive Production Of Vector Mesonsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This choice was made in [9] and [4,10,11]. One may argue that the coupling should be taken as perturbative at both upper vertices, then there is no square root in (14), (17). A similar comment holds for vector meson production (30).…”
Section: Comparison Of the DL And Ln Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At t = 0 the longitudinal polarisation vector readsε µ 0 = Q/(∆ · q) · ∆ µ to leading order in ξ −1 , and it is easy to see that the sum of the first and the second term in the brackets of (14) gives an amplitude proportional to L 2 for longitudinal photons. For transverse photons the amplitude is proportional to L 1 in the case m q = 0 when only the first term contributes, and it involves both loop integrals for finite quark mass due to the third term.…”
Section: Comparison Of the DL And Ln Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the differences let us compare the values of L 1 , L 2 and K in some kinematical limits, keeping in mind that there is also an additional root of α s (λ 2 )/α (0) s in (14). We always assume that µ …”
Section: Comparison Of the DL And Ln Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The starting point of [14] is a pomeron with a vector coupling and a sign factor to ensure C = +1 exchange; a scalar term accompanied with specific sign instructions is then added to the γ µ -part of the coupling in order to restore current conservation in vector meson production. For a programme of investigating the general structure of the pomeron-quark vertex we refer to [21].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Approachesmentioning
The pomeron model of Donnachie and Landshoff does not conserve the electromagnetic current when applied to diffractive reactions such as electroproduction of a quarkantiquark pair or of a vector meson. We propose a treatment of this problem which ensures a physical behaviour of cross sections in the photoproduction limit and show that it leads to results rather similar to those obtained from two-gluon exchange.
The pomeron model of Donnachie and Landshoff does not conserve the electromagnetic current when applied to diffractive reactions such as electroproduction of a quarkantiquark pair or of a vector meson. We propose a treatment of this problem which ensures a physical behaviour of cross sections in the photoproduction limit and show that it leads to results rather similar to those obtained from two-gluon exchange.
We calculate the cross section and the A ll asymmetry of the diffractive vector meson leptoproduction for a simple model of the pomeron coupling with the proton. It is found that the sensitivity of the spin-dependent cross section of the diffractive J/Ψ production to the pomeron coupling structure is rather weak. The conclusion is made that it will be difficult to study the structure of the pomeron coupling with the proton in future polarized diffractive experiments on the J/Ψ production.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.