2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0na00095g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffractive dipolar coupling in non-Bravais plasmonic lattices

Abstract: Honeycomb plasmonic lattices are characterized by a 2-particle unit cell. The difference between the intrasublattice and intersublattice coupling is distinctive of non-Bravais lattices. Although the two particles are identical the two types of coupling may be different.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, following our previous work on arrays with multiparticle unit cells (see also refs. , , and ), we can write the x -component of dipole induced in a given nanoparticle as where we use Greek indices to denote the unit cell to which the particle belongs and Latin ones to label each of the two particles within the unit cell. Furthermore, the prime in the first summation indicates that the terms ν = μ are excluded from it when i = j , since a dipole does not interact with itself, and G ij , μν is the xx -component of the dipole–dipole interaction tensor, defined as with T μ – T ν being the vector connecting the μ and ν unit cells and k = 2π/λ the wavenumber.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, following our previous work on arrays with multiparticle unit cells (see also refs. , , and ), we can write the x -component of dipole induced in a given nanoparticle as where we use Greek indices to denote the unit cell to which the particle belongs and Latin ones to label each of the two particles within the unit cell. Furthermore, the prime in the first summation indicates that the terms ν = μ are excluded from it when i = j , since a dipole does not interact with itself, and G ij , μν is the xx -component of the dipole–dipole interaction tensor, defined as with T μ – T ν being the vector connecting the μ and ν unit cells and k = 2π/λ the wavenumber.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both finite and infinite arrays, two different geometries are considered: square array of Al NPs, and a honeycomb array of Au NPs; see Figure 1. Depending on the application and spectral range of CLRs, square arrays of plasmonic NPs are widely considered in Ag [46], Au [5,47,48], Al [41,44,[49][50][51] and TiN [52] NPs, whereas honeycomb lattices are considered for Ag [53][54][55][56] and Au [57] NPs, within ED approximation in almost all cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We begin by applying our method to the case of a honeycomb monolayer of Ag nanospheres with radius a = 10 nm, described by a Drude dielectric function, and hosted within a homogeneous medium of dielectric constant √ h = 1.46, which describe the substrate used in experimental systems [14]. The separation distance between particle centers in a layer is d = 3a, so that we can safely restrict our calculations to the dipole approximation (l max = 1) [29].…”
Section: Monolayermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These modes show a collective behavior on the long-range scale, involving several unit cells. They have been recently studied also in non-Bravais [14][15][16] and vertically stacked plasmonic lattices [17]. Diffractive lattices present striking spectral far-field properties, among which Fano-like resonances, electromagnetically induced transparency windows, ultra-sharp linewidth are just few examples [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%