1984
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(84)90013-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffraction from stepped surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
90
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 391 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a generally accepted model, 8 this process at the surface competes with the formation of Si monomers at the SiO 2 /Si interface, which may be produced by Si diffusing through the oxide. This leads to an etching process also at the inner interface and formation of etch pits 5,9 with ͑111͒-or ͑113͒-oriented facets that turn out to be the most stable facets under this reaction. A smooth surface bare of oxygen can therefore only be achieved when the reaction of evaporated Si with SiO 2 at the vacuum interface is much faster than the reaction at the inner surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a generally accepted model, 8 this process at the surface competes with the formation of Si monomers at the SiO 2 /Si interface, which may be produced by Si diffusing through the oxide. This leads to an etching process also at the inner interface and formation of etch pits 5,9 with ͑111͒-or ͑113͒-oriented facets that turn out to be the most stable facets under this reaction. A smooth surface bare of oxygen can therefore only be achieved when the reaction of evaporated Si with SiO 2 at the vacuum interface is much faster than the reaction at the inner surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 for two different scattering energies E 1 and E 2 , the intensity profile of the ͑0,0͒ beam obtained after diffraction from a rough crystalline surface consists of a sharp central spike ͑dominated by the instrument response function of the SPA-LEED optics͒ and shoulders ͑determined by the Fourier transform of the generally unknown step distribution function on the surface͒. 18,19 Their relative intensities depend on the phase relationship for scattering between adjacent levels, i.e., the energy. Changing from an in-phase to an out-of phase energy, a decrease in the sharp central spike region and an intensity increase in the shoulder structure is observed ͑and vice versa͒.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such changes include broadening without changing shape, splitting into multiple spots, or change of shape at different incident beam energies (from a sharp and strong spot to a weaker spot with shoulder or ring around, for example). The effects of different types of non-flat surfaces have on the spot profile had been studied thoroughly by Lent and Cohen [13], Pukite, Lent and Cohen [14] and Zhm, Luo and Henzler [15]. Assuming a two layer system, which is appropriate for Pb/Si(lll) since Pb islands have steep edges and flat tops and only the top of islands and the area between islands are exposed to incident electrons (see lower right of figure l.l), Ref [13,14,151 all had shown that, by the Fourier transform of the pair correlation function, the profile of the specular spot is given by I(As) = [l -TI(@, As)]2nd(As//) + I1(6', As,)C(As//),…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, by measuring the position of the satellite spot around (00) spot at an out-of-phase condition, one can determine the average island separation S by (1. 13) where Kl is the position of the satellite spot, a0 the substrate lattice constant, Klo = 27r/ao is the distance between (00) and (IO) spot. The bottom of figure 1.6 shows how to measure such a quantity.…”
Section: Lateral Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%