1993
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(93)90707-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diffraction dissociation in collisions at √s=1.8 TeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diffraction is due to the Pomeron exchange but the exact nature of the Pomeron in QCD is not yet elucidated. The first test of a model of diffractive dissociation (SD) is the ability to properly describe the mass (M X ) distribution of diffractive systems, which has been measured in many experiments [51] and parametrized as (M In Ref. [15] we studied diffractive mass distributions using the Interacting Gluon Model focusing on their energy dependence and their connection with inelasticity distributions.…”
Section: Leading Charm and Beautymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diffraction is due to the Pomeron exchange but the exact nature of the Pomeron in QCD is not yet elucidated. The first test of a model of diffractive dissociation (SD) is the ability to properly describe the mass (M X ) distribution of diffractive systems, which has been measured in many experiments [51] and parametrized as (M In Ref. [15] we studied diffractive mass distributions using the Interacting Gluon Model focusing on their energy dependence and their connection with inelasticity distributions.…”
Section: Leading Charm and Beautymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 9 shows the diffractive mass spectrum for √ s = 1800 GeV compared to experimental data from the E710 Collaboration [53]. In these curves we have used our intermediate Pomeron profile: G IP (y) given by (8) with m = 5 and p IP = 0.05.…”
Section: Leading Charm and Beautymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 2 we have decomposed Q 2 σ tot (γ * N, x, Q 2 ) into the non-LLA component (18), which we can neglect, and the LLA component (17), in which all the explicit dependence on Q 2 is concentrated in the integration limit. This is the crucial point, since taking the derivative (121) and making use of Eq.…”
Section: Unitarization and Linear Gldap Versus Nonlinear Glr Evolutiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These multiple pomeron exchanges cast shadow on the reinterpretation of the diffraction dissociation in terms of the photon-pomeron interaction. Experimentally α IP (0) > 1 [16,17], the total cross sections are rising and the mass spectrum of the diffraction dissociation of protons exhibits slight deviations from the 1/M 2 law [18]. Furthermore, the cross section of the diffraction dissociation of virtual photons was shown to be infrared sensitive [7][8][9]19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At pp collider experiments, the reaction pp → Xp ′ has been studied in detail [1,2], whilst at HERA the process γp → Xp ′ has also been closely investigated for both real and virtual photons [3][4][5][6][7][8]. These processes are often interpreted using Regge phenomenology in terms of the exchange of colourless objects between the colliding particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%