2020
DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2020.1768578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Difficult heritage and digital media: ‘selfie culture’ and emotional practices at the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe

Abstract: This article sheds light on the entanglements of difficult heritage and digital media through an ethnographic analysis of digital photography and social media practices at the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe in Berlin. After a discussion of the project 'Yolocaust', through which an artist publicly shamed the 'selfie culture' at the memorial, the article argues that the sweeping condemnation of digital self-representations in the context of Holocaust remembrance remains simplistic. Instead, many visitor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This code of ethics is articulated on Instagram in the form of digilantism, which is recognisable as a social movement (Gerbauda and Treré, 2015) which organises itself in opposition to Holocaust tourism as a performed identity. We also extend the conceptual analysis offered by Bareither, (2021) in noting the complex identity work that is provoked in response to Holocaust heritage selfies which are posted as a way of exploring and enacting emotional relationships to the past. We suggest that, far from being simplistic (2021) and sweeping, the narratives of condemnation, at least on Instagram are nuanced, and tend to emanate from the Anglosphere, targeting mainly young women and non-native English speakers, enunciating cultural capital to assert status.…”
Section: Theoretical and Management Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This code of ethics is articulated on Instagram in the form of digilantism, which is recognisable as a social movement (Gerbauda and Treré, 2015) which organises itself in opposition to Holocaust tourism as a performed identity. We also extend the conceptual analysis offered by Bareither, (2021) in noting the complex identity work that is provoked in response to Holocaust heritage selfies which are posted as a way of exploring and enacting emotional relationships to the past. We suggest that, far from being simplistic (2021) and sweeping, the narratives of condemnation, at least on Instagram are nuanced, and tend to emanate from the Anglosphere, targeting mainly young women and non-native English speakers, enunciating cultural capital to assert status.…”
Section: Theoretical and Management Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Such research combines observations and different types of participant interviews. Bareither (2020), for example, in his work on the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe, conducts a digital ethnography by combining on-site and chat interviews with content analyses of Instagram and Facebook posts. This method closely resembles the one proposed in the present article.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, one of the most controversial debates regarding the appropriateness of image practices at the memorial has been sparked through the ubiquity of ‘smiling selfies’ taken at the site. Since the question of whether such ‘happy pictures’ enact emotional indifference is too complex to be discussed here in detail (but see Bareither, 2020; see also Dalziel, 2016; Kansteiner, 2018), it must suffice here to say that portraits and also selfies can serve as tools to enact emotional experiences in relation to the memorial. Surprisingly, many selfies taken at the site show visitors who do not smile into the camera.…”
Section: Enacting the Emotional Affordances Of Heritage Sites Through Digital Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%