1982
DOI: 10.1163/002829683x00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of the Jaw Adductor Muscle of the Rosy Barb, Barbus Conchonius (Teleostei, Cyprinidae, L.), During Development

Abstract: The differentiation of the jaw adductor muscle of the rosy barb, Barbus conchonius, has been studied during development to determine the relation between fiber type and early muscle activity. First, a morphological description and a functional analysis with electromyography has been made of the jaw adductor of the adult fish. Based on this analysis and on histochemical characteristics, the jaw adductor muscle can be divided into two parts: an aerobic part, which shows contractile activity during respiration, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both taxa the adductor had two parts, one with small, low-ATPase, oxidative fibers active during respiration and the other with larger, less oxidative fibers active only during feeding. Barends et al (1983) also reviewed earlier work on teleost jaw adductors, mostly showing a similar division between aerobic and anaerobic portions. It should be noted that all of the above authors distinguished multiple fiber types, usually four to five, making the reduction to two groups an oversimplification.…”
Section: Fishes Amphibians Reptiles and Birdsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both taxa the adductor had two parts, one with small, low-ATPase, oxidative fibers active during respiration and the other with larger, less oxidative fibers active only during feeding. Barends et al (1983) also reviewed earlier work on teleost jaw adductors, mostly showing a similar division between aerobic and anaerobic portions. It should be noted that all of the above authors distinguished multiple fiber types, usually four to five, making the reduction to two groups an oversimplification.…”
Section: Fishes Amphibians Reptiles and Birdsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The first group had only fast, lowmitochondria fibers, while the second group had high-mitochondria fibers of variable ATPase activity. Barends (1979) and Barends et al (1983) compared various parts of the m. adductor mandibulae in the perch and in the rosy barb, Barbus conchonius. In both taxa the adductor had two parts, one with small, low-ATPase, oxidative fibers active during respiration and the other with larger, less oxidative fibers active only during feeding.…”
Section: Fishes Amphibians Reptiles and Birdsmentioning
confidence: 99%