2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)00562-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of cysts from solid tumors in the breast with diffuse optical tomography1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intra-and interobserver agreement were good to excellent, indicating a reproducible method. Our results are in agreement with previously published studies using different techniques [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Detection rates ranging from 0.04 to 1.00 were reported, irrespective of lesion classification (benign/malignant).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Intra-and interobserver agreement were good to excellent, indicating a reproducible method. Our results are in agreement with previously published studies using different techniques [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Detection rates ranging from 0.04 to 1.00 were reported, irrespective of lesion classification (benign/malignant).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A large amount of work has been performed on the utilisation of light to noninvasively study human tissues [1,2] and to deliver various treatments [3]. These positive results are based on a good understanding of light transport in turbid media, the availability of powerful numerical tools and a precise knowledge of the optical properties of the biological materials of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system was developed based on experience with an existing MR-guided NIRST approach [34], but for the purpose of dynamic monitoring of responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy within the infusion suite. Studies utilizing diffuse optical tomography technique typically incorporate less than 4 wavelengths in the range of 680 -850nm [6,7,42,43], which inhibits accurate recovery of water and lipid content. Here, three FD wavelengths and six CW wavelengths provided coverage in the range of 661 -1064nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%