2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2686-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional shear-wave elastography

Abstract: Two-dimensional and 3D SWE performed equally in distinguishing benign from malignant masses and both techniques improved the specificity of B-mode ultrasound.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
72
4
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
72
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work, the most useful and reproducible measure was the mass/fat elasticity ratio, unlike what was found by Wang et al (P < 0.01 vs. P = 0.088) (18). Breast fat tissue shows minimal elastographic variability, and the elasticity values are very low, supporting the use of fat tissue stiffness as a comparator (16,19). Probe compression raises elastographic values, increasing the likelihood of overdiagnosis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…In the present work, the most useful and reproducible measure was the mass/fat elasticity ratio, unlike what was found by Wang et al (P < 0.01 vs. P = 0.088) (18). Breast fat tissue shows minimal elastographic variability, and the elasticity values are very low, supporting the use of fat tissue stiffness as a comparator (16,19). Probe compression raises elastographic values, increasing the likelihood of overdiagnosis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…In the present study, the additional use of SWE to conventional US reduced the rate of benign lesion biopsy by 46.0% to 85.7%. This result is similar to those others have reported (8,28,29). In BI-RADS category 3 cases, biopsies are frequently performed at the request of the clinician or patient.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Based on no loss in accuracy, EMAX, EMEANH and SD were further improved in sensitivity when orthogonal acquisitions conducted. Though the cut-off values are different [1] and some are higher than the values in this study [3,4,[11][12][13][14][15], the diagnostic performances are almost fair [3,4,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. It can be resulted by high rate of DCIS (6/41 in malignant group) and hard rule of avoiding pressure (images with apparent artefacts were excluded) in this study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%