2004
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200411000-00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation of Adrenal Adenomas From Metastases With Unenhanced Computed Tomography

Abstract: The differentiation between adrenal adenomas and metastases is improved by applying our scoring system compared with any single parameter alone. The total score is obtained by adding 10% of the density values to the size in centimeters, plus 2 if the contour of the lesion is blurred and plus 1 if the structure is inhomogeneous. By setting the threshold at 7 points, all but 1 lesion were classified correctly.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some have also suggested using combinations of these parameters, but to our knowledge, neither the independent nor the multivariate performance of the parameters has been evaluated. Various descriptive radiologic features, such as the characteristics of the lesion margin and internal morphology, have also been explored as potential discriminators [14, 15]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have also suggested using combinations of these parameters, but to our knowledge, neither the independent nor the multivariate performance of the parameters has been evaluated. Various descriptive radiologic features, such as the characteristics of the lesion margin and internal morphology, have also been explored as potential discriminators [14, 15]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,9 Moreover, currently there is no imaging modality available that allows the distinction between adrenal adenoma and adrenal metastasis with 100% diagnostic accuracy. 10 Therefore, in the absence of other metastasis, a patient with synchronous colorectal carcinoma and suspicious adrenal tumor should have both lesions resected to achieve a cure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT characteristics used for scoring are combined morphologic criteria with the density measurements on NECT proposed by Gufler et al 3 The total score is obtained by adding 10% of the density values to the size in centimeters, plus 2 if the contour of the lesion is blurred and plus 1 if the structure is inhomogeneous. Score of less than 7 is taken as benign and more than or equal to 7 as malignant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in concordance with previous study by Gufler et al, who proposed the scoring which we have adopted for our study. 3 The total score is obtained by adding 10% of the density values to the size in centimeters, plus 2 if the contour of the lesion is blurred and plus 1 if the structure is inhomogeneous. The highest predictive power was calculated at a cutoff value of 7.05, with 100% sensitivity and 96.8% specificity for the detection of metastasis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%