In recent years, age estimation has become increasingly important in living people for a variety of reasons, including identifying criminal and legal responsibility, and for many other social events such as a birth certificate, marriage, beginning a job, joining the army, and retirement.Objectives:The aim of this study was to assess the developmental stages of left seven mandibular teeth for estimation of dental age (DA) in different age groups and to evaluate the possible correlation between DA and chronological age (CA) in South Indian population using Willems method.Materials and Methods:Digital Orthopantomogram of 332 subjects (166 males, 166 females) who fit the study and the criteria were obtained. Assessment of mandibular teeth (from central incisor to the second molar on left quadrant) development was undertaken and DA was assessed using Willems method.Results and Discussion:The present study showed a significant correlation between DA and CA in both males (r = 0.71 and females (r = 0.88). The overall mean difference between the estimated DA and CA for males was 0.69 ± 2.14 years (P < 0.001) while for females, it was 0.08 ± 1.34 years (P > 0.05). Willems method underestimated the mean age of males by 0.69 years and females by 0.08 years and showed that females mature earlier than males in selected population. The mean difference between DA and CA according to Willems method was 0.39 years and is statistically significant (P < 0.05).Conclusion:This study showed significant relation between DA and CA. Thus, digital radiographic assessment of mandibular teeth development can be used to generate mean DA using Willems method and also the estimated age range for an individual of unknown CA.
INTRODUCTIONCharacterizing adrenal lesions in patients with a known primary malignancy has a vital role in treatment and prognostication. Approximately 40-57% of adrenal incidentalomas are benign in these patients. 1 The prevalence of adrenal metastases in patients with known primary malignancy ranges between 32% and 73% in different series.2 CT, MRI and FDG PET are widely used to characterize adrenal lesions.In a retrospective study by Gufler et al, the combined morphologic criteria with the density measurements on NECT, found a high accuracy in differentiating adrenal adenomas from metastases in patients with a known malignancy.3 They proposed a scoring system based on density, contour, homogeneity and size.This study evaluates the sensitivity and specificity of this NECT scoring system and comparing it with that of 18F FDG PET.
ABSTRACTBackground: Characterizing adrenal lesions in patients with a known primary malignancy has a vital role in treatment and prognostication. A study by Gufler et al proposed a scoring system based on density, contour, homogeneity and size and found a high accuracy in differentiating adrenal adenomas from metastasis in patients with a known malignancy. This study evaluates the sensitivity and specificity of this NECT scoring system and comparing it with that of 18F FDG PET. Methods: The study was conducted on patients with diagnosed malignancies with adrenal mass, referred for 18F-FDG PET-CT scanning as a part of work up or follows up between October 2014 and March 2016. Whole-body CT and PET images were obtained using standard protocol. NECT scoring and quantitative analysis of FDG uptake in the adrenal lesions (SUVavg analysis) is done separately. Results: Of the 50 patients studied, 33 patients had benign adrenal lesions and the rest had metastatic lesions. Most common site of primary was lung. NECT score yielded a sensitivity of 88.2%, specificity of 100% and positive predictive value of 100%. SUVavg analysis yielded a 100% sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value. Comparison of the predictive power of the two tests showed a z score of 2.5 and p value of 0.0124. Conclusions: 18-FDG PET can be considered as a gold standard for differentiating between metastasis and benign lesions of adrenal glands in patients with known primary. NECT has a comparable specificity as that of FDG PET, however with lower sensitivity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.