2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differentiation and diagnosis of benign and malignant testicular lesions using 18F-FDG PET/CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study involving 203 men has demonstrated that the normal SUV range from 1.23 to 3.85 with a mean value of 2.44 [ 23 ]. In addition, previous study including 53 patients has reported that a SUV max of 3.75 is the optimal cut-off value for differentiating between benign and malignant testicular diseases [ 24 ]. As for the testicular lesions of our population, the mean SUV max was 11.09, with a range of 7.20 to 19.75.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study involving 203 men has demonstrated that the normal SUV range from 1.23 to 3.85 with a mean value of 2.44 [ 23 ]. In addition, previous study including 53 patients has reported that a SUV max of 3.75 is the optimal cut-off value for differentiating between benign and malignant testicular diseases [ 24 ]. As for the testicular lesions of our population, the mean SUV max was 11.09, with a range of 7.20 to 19.75.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this fact, FDG-PET can be used in clinical routine to aid in discrimination between benign and malignant lesions [57], might predict treatment response [810] and might also be able to reflect histopathology parameters of tumors [11, 12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 16 ] Mean testicular volume reported by Gupta et al ., Huang et al ., Fui MNT et al ., and Anafa et al . was 16.73 cm 3 ,[ 23 ] 16.57 cm 3 ,[ 25 ] 18.0 cm 3 ,[ 26 ] and 18.57 cm 3 ,[ 14 ] respectively. These values observed in studies done in Asia and Australia are similar to the values observed in the Indian population of our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 9 10 11 ] Hence, an understanding of the normal physiological variations in the distribution of FDG in testes is important for the proper interpretation of FDG-PET/CT scans. [ 12 13 14 ] There are few studies that have already evaluated the physiological FDG uptake in testes; however, no studies are there among the Indian population to the best of our knowledge. In this study, we have retrospectively analyzed the physiological FDG uptake in the apparently healthy testes, among the Indian population, who have undergone FDG PET/CT scans for various malignancies (excluding testicular malignancies).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%